Reason: None provided.
Yes.
But the point of the ruling is that the state is trying to tell that a federal court cannot litigate a case because it has already been reviewed, or even the Scotus for that matter.
This is legally laughable.
118 days ago
13 score
Reason: Original
Yes.
But the point of the ruling is that the state is trying to tell that a federal court cannot litigate a case because it has already been reviewed, or even the Scotus for that matter.
This legally laughable.
118 days ago
1 score