Sure, he may have been on her side in respect to Flynn.

He still basically made assumptions about her knowledge of her own fraud case, as he's not talked to her, then attacked her for the short comings of his own presumed assumptions about her case, that's hardly fair.

I like Barnes, he seems to personally not like Sidney at the worst, believe her claim was too big to pursue so it was remiss of her to even try, which seemed odd.

I don't think anything intentional, he's just got blinders on with respect to Sidney -- maybe he knows something we don't, and I'll reserve judgement that he may be right in the end, but I think as it stands he's off about her, at the moment.

Sure, he may have been on her side in respect to Flynn.

He still basically made assumptions about her knowledge of her own fraud case, as he's not talked to her, then attacked her for the short comings of his own presumed assumptions about her case, that's hardly fair.

I like Barnes, he seems to personally not like Sidney at the worst, believe her claim was too big to pursue so it was remiss of her to even try, which seemed odd.

I don't think anything intentional, he's just got blinders on with respect to Sidney -- not maybe he knows something we don't, and I'll reserve judgement that he may be right in the end, but I think as it stands he's off about her, at the moment.