There is tremendous precedent for election remedy. Many elections have been tossed even if voters are disenfranchised. The courts have even selected a different winner because of issues with the election. The idea that massive fraud would disenfranchise too many people is a fallacy, allowing it to continue in each state election.

This conclusion is what needs to be possibly appealed to the Supreme Court for clarification.

There is tremendous precedent for election remedy. Many elections have been tossed even if voters are disenfranchised. The courts have even selected a different winner because of issues with an election.

This conclusion is what needs to be possibly appealed to the Supreme Court for clarification.

There is tremendous precedent for election remedy. Many elections have been tossed even if voters are disenfranchised. The courts have even selected a different winner because of issues with the election.

This conclusion is what needs to be possibly appealed to the Supreme Court for clarification.

There is tremendous precedent for election remedy. Many elections have been tossed even if voters are disenfranchised. The courts have even granted the election to the initial loser because of issues with the election.

This conclusion is what needs to be appealed to the Supreme Court.