This theory holds only if:
1. the total count of paper ballots is far less than the news number ; or
2. If there are a way to generate ballots, ballots belong to the same voter are found in the recount.
And these are very risky for them once full recount is conducted.
Recounting on 2 counties have been done and didn't found significantly different number of ballots.
Your report specifies that almost all counties are involved:
So #1 is false. But #2 is still possible.
One thing is for sure: the voter reg's "update November 2020 value" function is highly suppressed. The current count of "November 2020" <> '' proves it. The suppression will allow duplicate ballots.
Just among the absentee table, we found 18 successfully returned absentee ballots which are duplicates of the same VRN, most on different dates (so it's not a repeat-scan human error). 6 of them are counted as ‘Absentee' in voter reg table, other 12 have no value. Their VRNs are: 0012680570
0016679089
0017882435
0019662071
0031888073
0046613576
0046628617
0046639225
0704444980
0704851500
0709955790
0712874260
700656802
700870461
701213365
701300411
701329590
701329645
If these can be accepted, you can re-scan by mistake or intentionally. You can copy ballots and scan. There is no fair election. Again, #2 is still possible.
This theory holds only if:
1. the total count of paper ballots is far less than the news number ; or
2. If there are a way to generate ballots, ballots belong to the same voter are found in the recount.
And these are very risky once full recount is conducted.
We have finished recounting one county and found a little more ballots.
Your report specifies that almost all counties are involved:
So #1 is false. But #2 is still possible.
One thing is for sure: the voter reg's "update November 2020 value" function is highly suppressed. The current count of "November 2020" <> '' proves it. The suppression will allow duplicate ballots.
Just among the absentee table, we found 18 successfully returned absentee ballots which are duplicates of the same VRN, most on different dates (so it's not a repeat-scan human error). 6 of them are counted as ‘Absentee' in voter reg table, other 12 have no value. Their VRNs are: 0012680570
0016679089
0017882435
0019662071
0031888073
0046613576
0046628617
0046639225
0704444980
0704851500
0709955790
0712874260
700656802
700870461
701213365
701300411
701329590
701329645
If these can be accepted, you can re-scan by mistake or intentionally. You can copy ballots and scan. There is no fair election. Again, #2 is still possible.