Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES Front All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: Typo

Because the MSM lost the right to tell me what's real and what's not. Their track record regarding their unwillingness to ask questions or dig deeper proves to me they are no longer reliable as a source of "truth."

All "proof" is circumstantial. Say I drive to a crime scene and find you standing over a dead body with a bloody knife in your hand and you yourself, covered in the victims blood . It is entirely possible you arent the killer... it's not probable, but it is possible.

This is why cases must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" and not "with 100% certainty."

For me, it is beyond a reasonable doubt that Seth was murdered (targeted). It's beyond a reasonable doubt Epstein was murdered.

There is a rampant narcissism and arrogamce with taking the "how do you idiots fall for LARPS" stance but 5 years ago Epstein info was considered "conspiracy" among a load of other controversial non-msm stories. The only reason they are now in the societal consiousness is because "people who fall for LARPS" kept insisting on talking about them anyway.

95 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Because the MSM lost the right to tell me what's real and what's not. Their track record regarding their unwillingness to ask questions or dig deeper proves to me they are no longer reliable as a source of "truth."

All "proof" is circumstantial. Say I drive to a crime scene and find you standing over a dead body with a bloody knife in your hand and you yourself, covered in the victims blood . It is entirely possible you arent the killer... it's not probable, but it is possible.

This is why cases must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt" and not "with 100% certainty."

For me, it is beyond a reasonable doubt that Seth was murdered. It's beyond a reasonable doubt Epstein was murdered.

There is a rampant narcissism and arrogamce with taking the "how do you idiots fall for LARPS" stance but 5 years ago Epstein info was considered "conspiracy" among a load of other controversial non-msm stories. The only reason they are now in the societal consiousness is because "people who fall for LARPS" kept insisting on talking about them anyway.

95 days ago
1 score