Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

230 doesn't allow them to censor, it's supposed to discourage censorship because it protects them from liability for user content. The problem is it's not being interpreted in a way that large multi-billion dollar "platforms" lose their platform status if they don't allow free-speech content.

Without 230, it would make all community websites impossible. I've seen a lot of posts here which, if the hosts were liable, would easily drive them into bankruptcy or worse.

230 needs to be re-interpreted in the context of monopolies and anti-Trust and billion dollar companies. Just saying all companies are legally responsible for everything people post on their site would be another form of tyranny. To be clear, if you get to a certain size you should be required to observe free-speech protection and special oversight and transparency. That is a much better solution than nuking every small company who can't implement mass censorship and legal teams to insulate themselves from liability. If 230 goes away, every community driven company smaller than Google, Facebook, etc. would be immediately driven to bankruptcy.

134 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

230 doesn't allow them to censor, it's supposed to discourage censorship because it protects them from liability for user content. The problem is it's not being interpreted in a way that large multi-billion dollar "platforms" lose their platform status if they don't allow free-speech content.

Without 230, it would make all community websites impossible. I've seen a lot of posts here which, if the hosts were liable, would easily drive them into bankruptcy or worse.

230 needs to be re-interpreted in the context of monopolies and anti-Trust and billion dollar companies. Just saying all companies are legally responsible for everything people post on their site would be another form of tyranny. To be clear, if you get to a certain size you should be required to observe free-speech protection and special oversight and transparency, that is a much better solution that nuking every small company without massive censorship and legal teams which would fold immediately under lawsuits for user comments.

134 days ago
1 score