Also these are civil court cases, where only a "preponderance of evidence" is required, as opposed to criminal court, where a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard applies.

Normally yes. But these are Election Fraud civil cases. The bar is much higher than preponderance of evidence. These Courts are really really reluctant to throw out votes.

And where are these ongoing cases? We have got these States like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona who have already certified their elections.

Time is running out if it has not already.

Where is the path and timeline to victory with these civil cases?

Only path to victory now is EO 13848. Just as Attorney Lin Wood says.

Also these are civil court cases, where only a "preponderance of evidence" is required, as opposed to criminal court, where a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard applies.

Normally yes. But these are Election Fraud cases. The bar is much higher than preponderance of evidence. These Courts are really really reluctant to throw out votes.

And where are these ongoing cases? We have got these States like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona who have already certified their elections.

Time is running out if it has not already.

Where is the path and timeline to victory with these civil cases?

Only path to victory now is EO 13848. Just as Attorney Lin Wood says.

Also these are civil court cases, where only a "preponderance of evidence" is required, as opposed to criminal court, where a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard applies.

Normally yes. But these are Election Fraud cases. The bar is much higher than preponderance of evidence. These Courts are really really reluctant to throw out votes.

And where are these ongoing cases? We have got these States like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona who have already certified their elections.

Time is running out if it has not already.

Where is the path to victory with these civil cases?

Also these are civil court cases, where only a "preponderance of evidence" is required, as opposed to criminal court, where a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard applies.

Normally yes. But these are Election Fraud cases. The bar is much higher than preponderance of evidence. These Courts are really really reluctant to throw out votes.

And where are these ongoing cases? We have got these States like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona who have already certified their elections.

Time is running out ifit has not already.

Where is the path to victory with these civil cases?

Also these are civil court cases, where only a "preponderance of evidence" is required, as opposed to criminal court, where a "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard applies.

Normally yes. But these are Election Fraud cases. The bar is much higher than preponderance of evidence. These Courts are really really reluctant to throw out votes.

And where are these ongoing cases? We have got these States like Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona who have already certified their elections.

Time is running out of it has not already.