Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Me too, I prefer antitrust for abusive network monopolies, and platform laws (like we have for the phone companies) to protect civil liberties. Leave everything else alone, or else the commies will be suing everyone.

Liability law is already one of their most potent weapons for justifying corporate censorship and control. (Peter Huber's book Liability is old but based.)

Spez: Good review of Huber here:

https://fee.org/articles/book-review-liability-the-legal-revolution-and-its-consequences-by-peter-w-huber/

"The concept of negligence was redefined to mean, roughly, producing anything that isn’t perfect."

133 days ago
3 score
Reason: None provided.

Me too, I prefer antitrust for abusive network monopolies, and platform laws (like we have for the phone companies) to protect civil liberties. Leave everything else alone, or else the commies will be suing everyone.

Liability law is already one of their most potent weapons for justifying corporate censorship and control. (Peter Huber's book Liability is old but based.)

133 days ago
3 score
Reason: Original

Me to, I prefer antitrust for abusive network monopolies, and platform laws (like we have for the phone companies) to protect civil liberties. Leave everything else alone, or else the commies will be suing everyone.

Liability law is already one of their most potent weapons for justifying corporate censorship and control. (Peter Huber's book Liability is old but based.)

133 days ago
1 score