Win / TheDonald
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

She says: "All this evidence has already been debunked in court":

NO IT HASN'T YOU DUMBOCRAT CUNT. THOSE CASES WERE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF STANDING, WHICH MEANS NO EVIDENCE WAS CONSIDERED. THE COURT JUST SAID "It's either: you're the wrong person to sue, you're suing the wrong person, or we're the wrong court to hear this case."

NOTHING BUT YOUR DUMBASS STATEMENT HAS BEEN DEBUNKED. THAT'S WHY AMERICA'S MAYOR BRINGING THE EVIDENCE DIRECT TO YOU SINCE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION IT'S YOUR JOB ALONE TO CONSIDER THE EVIDENCE AND MAKE THE DECISION.

50 days ago
35 score
Reason: Original

She says: "All this evidence has already been debunked in court":

NO IT HASN'T YOU DUMBOCRAT CUNT. THOSE CASES WERE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF STANDING, WHICH MEANS NO EVIDENCE WAS CONSIDERED. THE COURT JUST SAID "It's either: you're the wrong person to sue, you're sueing the wrong person, or we're the wrong court to hear this case."

NOTHING BUT YOUR DUMBASS STATEMENT HAS BEEN DEBUNKED. THAT'S WHY AMERICA'S MAYOR BRINGING THE EVIDENCE DIRECT TO YOU SINCE UNDER THE CONSTITUTION IT'S YOUR JOB ALONE TO CONSIDER THE EVIDENCE AND MAKE THE DECISION.

50 days ago
1 score