i'm playing fast & loose with the math. its total population ("the county itself has 36000 people" i thought i was being clear), which is a proxy for # voters (i know full well they arent the same thing, but they should map proportionally)

not everyone votes, of course. that however is unrelated to frequency and delta. re-read what I wrote. The 1/1000 becomes 1/500 when you turn 37 votes into a delta calculation, making it 74, thus, doubling the occurrence from 1/1000 to 1/500.

Perhaps the switching algorithm dynamically does it and it isn't based off the # registered voters (or county population) a priori, though. Who knows. that is just my hunch, that they just use a simple but reasonable metric to base their fraud on. like, if they had expert algorithm writers, they wouldn't be working at dominion, would they? wouldn't they be at google or something? or making video game engines? or brain-machine interface decoders?

they probably hire shitty programmers at dominion that probably wouldn't be able to code a decent dynamic heuristic for undetectable voter fraud. chinese people are CHEAP and wouldn't want to spend much money (source, work with cheap chinese)

i'm playing fast & loose with the math. its total population ("the county itself has 36000 people" i thought i was being clear), which is a proxy for # voters (i know full well they arent the same thing, but they should map proportionally)

not everyone votes, of course. that however is unrelated to frequency and delta. re-read what I wrote. The 1/1000 becomes 1/500 when you turn 37 votes into a delta calculation, making it 74, thus, doubling the occurrence from 1/1000 to 1/500.

Perhaps the switching algorithm dynamically does it and it isn't based off the # registered voters (or county population) a priori. Who knows.