But for some reason they don't want to prove this, to have actual charges they could go after him for, rather then just the kangaroo court they keep threatening to get him with if he leaves office? Why not? How about some of that evidence they like to talk about so much, I'm not seeing any. Who was paid off? How did Russia help him?

But for some reason they don't want to prove this, to have actual charges they could go after him for, rather then just the kangaroo court they keep threatening to get him with if he leaves office? Why not? How about some of that evidence they like to talk about so much, I'm not seeing any.