You wouldn't need to find anything on a computer, and you won't necessarily find anything, because as we know, Dominion was connected to the internet and managing it overseas. There are also multiple levels to this, where the machine might tabulate one thing, then Dominion connected to the internet basically double checks and decides how to allocate the manipulation to spread out across regions.

This is basically a footprint of the algorithm, and it analyzes the vote tabulation data, timestamped as it appeared live. So it's analyzing the output of the algorithm.

It is a smoking gun, because it shows statistics that would be impossible to obtain naturally. It proves manipulation. He even specifically points out updates where they came at the EXACT same timestamp in different areas and have the same ratio's of votes being reported. Not the same number, but the percentage difference between them, because it's not just balancing votes in one county, it's balancing them across all counties and precincts within those counties. So the algorithm is basically going "Ok, Trump is getting ahead, we need to flip X number of votes to Biden, and we'll do it here, and here, and there", all on the fly.

But it goes deeper than just percentage differences. The "wheel" system really is the key to understanding how the whole thing works. And wheel systems are artificial constructs, they don't just happen naturally, especially not with something as chaotic as counting shuffled votes. When people get in line to vote or put their ballots in a mail box or ballot box, it's no different than shuffling a deck of cards. That's exactly why it's impossible to have a machine suddenly report a stack of a hundred thousand votes for Biden.

You can think of the "wheel" as a load balancing mechanism. it's always trying to find equilibrium at a specific point, and rather than teeter totter with two big blocks, it's teetering thousands of tiny blocks of different sizes/weights on each end of the scale and moving them around to try to find the balance it's looking for. Those blocks represent every location where voting machines are being used.

When they update votes, they don't just spread it across just one machine either, they can spread it across every machine in a given region. So if they've got 20 machines in a given area, and they want to shift 20,000 votes for Biden, they will distribute that across all the machines in the area (not necessarily evenly either). But even when it's not spread evenly, there's a footprint, because timestamps show that load balancing is going on, and you wouldn't have such a thing arise from merely counting votes normally because it's an inherently chaotic/random venture. When you see an order to it, it's not by mistake, and indicates fraud.

Another part that makes it easier to see in action is the fact that they also needed to balance votes between a third party candidate, so you can see that the third party candidates vote updates fall in a specific range, in relation to the votes stolen from Trump, because of the "remainder" box they're using to balance the load, which means that basically, Biden and the third party candidate split some of Trump's votes to randomize things a bit, and because they need to do that to not end up with any errors in the balancing mechanism, otherwise errors could happen that actually throw votes back to Trump. It's like if you lean too far forward or backward, you're gonna fall over. And they need to account for the third party candidate, because they are part of the percentage of total votes. If the algorithm didn't factor them in, then you'd have a lot of issues where the fraud is even easier to see, and even issues where the algorithm reverses and gives votes to Trump instead of Biden.

Now you might think that "OK let's just count the actual ballots then, a recount should work". But the problem is, they also had a ground game that effectively threw away Trump ballots and replaced them with Biden ballots. So the algorithm is backed up by physical fraud too. The algorithm told them how many ballots they need to physically switch and replace, which they had plenty of time to do from election day until now, because it's highly likely that they were simply let in the door to do it, and they were also doing it on the fly on election day, which is exactly why people were sneaking ballots in the back door. It doesn't matter where or what order those ballots are in, only that they're present. So if you need 20K votes for Biden stuffed in an area, you just bring in 20K fraud ballots and mix them in with the pile, and then that aligns with the final fraud results that the machine reported.

You wouldn't need to find anything on a computer, and you won't necessarily find anything, because as we know, Dominion was connected to the internet and managing it overseas. There are also multiple levels to this, where the machine might tabulate one thing, then Dominion connected to the internet basically double checks and decides how to allocate the manipulation to spread out across regions.

This is basically a footprint of the algorithm, and it analyzes the vote tabulation data, timestamped as it appeared live. So it's analyzing the output of the algorithm.

It is a smoking gun, because it shows statistics that would be impossible to obtain naturally. It proves manipulation. He even specifically points out updates where they came at the EXACT same timestamp in different areas and have the same ratio's of votes being reported. Not the same number, but the percentage difference between them, because it's not just balancing votes in one county, it's balancing them across all counties and precincts within those counties. So the algorithm is basically going "Ok, Trump is getting ahead, we need to flip X number of votes to Biden, and we'll do it here, and here, and there", all on the fly.

But it goes deeper than just percentage differences. The "wheel" system really is the key to understanding how the whole thing works. And wheel systems are artificial constructs, they don't just happen naturally, especially not with something as chaotic as counting shuffled votes. When people get in line to vote or put their ballots in a mail box or ballot box, it's no different than shuffling a deck of cards. That's exactly why it's impossible to have a machine suddenly report a stack of a hundred thousand votes for Biden.

You can think of the "wheel" as a load balancing mechanism. it's always trying to find equilibrium at a specific point, and rather than teeter totter with two big blocks, it's teetering thousands of tiny blocks of different sizes/weights on each end of the scale and moving them around to try to find the balance it's looking for. Those blocks represent every location where voting machines are being used.

When they update votes, they don't just spread it across just one machine either, they can spread it across every machine in a given region. So if they've got 20 machines in a given area, and they want to shift 20,000 votes for Biden, they will distribute that across all the machines in the area (not necessarily evenly either). But even when it's not spread evenly, there's a footprint, because timestamps show that load balancing is going on, and you wouldn't have such a thing arise from merely counting votes normally because it's an inherently chaotic/random venture. When you see an order to it, it's not by mistake, and indicates fraud.

You wouldn't need to find anything on a computer, and you won't necessarily find anything, because as we know, Dominion was connected to the internet and managing it overseas. There are also multiple levels to this, where the machine might tabulate one thing, then Dominion connected to the internet basically double checks and decides how to allocate the manipulation to spread out across regions.

This is basically a footprint of the algorithm, and it analyzes the vote tabulation data, timestamped as it appeared live. So it's analyzing the output of the algorithm.

It is a smoking gun, because it shows statistics that would be impossible to obtain naturally. It proves manipulation. He even specifically points out updates where they came at the EXACT same timestamp in different areas and have the same ratio's of votes being reported. Not the same number, but the percentage difference between them, because it's not just balancing votes in one county, it's balancing them across all counties and precincts within those counties. So the algorithm is basically going "Ok, Trump is getting ahead, we need to flip X number of votes to Biden, and we'll do it here, and here, and there", all on the fly.

But it goes deeper than just percentage differences. The "wheel" system really is the key to understanding how the whole thing works. And wheel systems are artificial constructs, they don't just happen naturally, especially not with something as chaotic as counting shuffled votes. When people get in line to vote or put their ballots in a mail box or ballot box, it's no different than shuffling a deck of cards. That's exactly why it's impossible to have a machine suddenly report a stack of a hundred thousand votes for Biden.

You can think of the "wheel" as a load balancing mechanism. it's always trying to find equilibrium at a specific point, and rather than teeter totter with two big blocks, it's teetering thousands of tiny blocks of different sizes/weights on each end of the scale and moving them around to try to find the balance it's looking for. Those blocks represent every location where voting machines are being used.

When they update votes, they don't just spread it across just one machine either, they can spread it across every machine in a given region. So if they've got 20 machines in a given area, and they want to shift 20,000 votes for Biden, they will distribute that across all the machines in the area (not necessarily evenly either). But even when it's not spread evenly, there's a footprint, because timestamps show that load balancing is going on, and you wouldn't have such a thing arise from merely counting votes randomly, which is how elections work. Voting and vote counting is naturally a chaotic thing. When you see an order to it, it's not by mistake, and indicates fraud.

You wouldn't need to find anything on a computer, and you won't necessarily find anything, because as we know, Dominion was connected to the internet and managing it overseas. There are also multiple levels to this, where the machine might tabulate one thing, then Dominion connected to the internet basically double checks and decides how to allocate the manipulation to spread out across regions.

This is basically a footprint of the algorithm, and it analyzes the vote tabulation data, timestamped as it appeared live. So it's analyzing the output of the algorithm.

It is a smoking gun, because it shows statistics that would be impossible to obtain naturally. It proves manipulation. He even specifically points out updates where they came at the EXACT same timestamp in different areas and have the same ratio's of votes being reported. Not the same number, but the percentage difference between them, because it's not just balancing votes in one county, it's balancing them across all counties and precincts within those counties. So the algorithm is basically going "Ok, Trump is getting ahead, we need to flip X number of votes to Biden, and we'll do it here, and here, and there", all on the fly.

But it goes deeper than just percentage differences. The "wheel" system really is the key to understanding how the whole thing works. And wheel systems are artificial constructs, they don't just happen naturally, especially not with something as chaotic as counting shuffled votes. When people get in line to vote or put their ballots in a mail box or ballot box, it's no different than shuffling a deck of cards. That's exactly why it's impossible to have a machine suddenly report a stack of a hundred thousand votes for Biden.

You can think of the "wheel" as a load balancing mechanism. it's always trying to find equilibrium at a specific point, and rather than teeter totter with two big blocks, it's teetering thousands of tiny blocks of different sizes/weights on each end of the scale and moving them around to try to find the balance it's looking for. Those blocks represent every location where voting machines are counting votes.

When they update votes, they don't just spread it across just one machine either, they can spread it across every machine in a given region. So if they've got 20 machines in a given area, and they want to shift 20,000 votes for Biden, they will distribute that across all the machines in the area (not necessarily evenly either). But even when it's not spread evenly, there's a footprint, because timestamps show that load balancing is going on, and you wouldn't have such a thing arise from merely counting votes randomly, which is how elections work. Voting and vote counting is naturally a chaotic thing. When you see an order to it, it's not by mistake, and indicates fraud.

You wouldn't need to find anything on a computer, and you won't necessarily find anything, because as we know, Dominion was connected to the internet and managing it overseas. There are also multiple levels to this, where the machine might tabulate one thing, then Dominion connected to the internet basically double checks and decides how to allocate the manipulation to spread out across regions.

This is basically a footprint of the algorithm, and it analyzes the vote tabulation data, timestamped as it appeared live. So it's analyzing the output of the algorithm.

It is a smoking gun, because it shows statistics that would be impossible to obtain naturally. It proves manipulation. He even specifically points out updates where they came at the EXACT same timestamp in different areas and have the same ratio's of votes being reported. Not the same number, but the percentage difference between them, because it's not just balancing votes in one county, it's balancing them across all counties and precincts within those counties. So the algorithm is basically going "Ok, Trump is getting ahead, we need to flip X number of votes to Biden, and we'll do it here, and here, and there", all on the fly.

But it goes deeper than just percentage differences. The "wheel" system really is the key to understanding how the whole thing works. And wheel systems are artificial constructs, they don't just happen naturally, especially not with something as chaotic as counting shuffled votes. When people get in line to vote or put their ballots in a mail box or ballot box, it's no different than shuffling a deck of cards. That's exactly why it's impossible to have a machine suddenly report a stack of a hundred thousand votes for Biden.

You can think of the "wheel" as a load balancing mechanism. it's always trying to find equilibrium at a specific point, and rather than teeter totter with two big blocks, it's teetering thousands of tiny blocks on each end of the scale and moving them around to try to find the balance it's looking for. Those blocks represent every location where voting machines are counting votes.

When they update votes, they don't just spread it across just one machine either, they can spread it across every machine in a given region. So if they've got 20 machines in a given area, and they want to shift 20,000 votes for Biden, they will distribute that across all the machines in the area (not necessarily evenly either). But even when it's not spread evenly, there's a footprint, because timestamps show that load balancing is going on, and you wouldn't have such a thing arise from merely counting votes randomly, which is how elections work. Voting and vote counting is naturally a chaotic thing. When you see an order to it, it's not by mistake, and indicates fraud.

You wouldn't need to find anything on a computer, and you won't necessarily find anything, because as we know, Dominion was connected to the internet and managing it overseas. There are also multiple levels to this, where the machine might tabulate one thing, then Dominion connected to the internet basically double checks and decides how to allocate the manipulation to spread out across regions.

This is basically a footprint of the algorithm, and it analyzes the vote tabulation data, timestamped as it appeared live. So it's analyzing the output of the algorithm.

It is a smoking gun, because it shows statistics that would be impossible to obtain naturally. It proves manipulation. He even specifically points out updates where they came at the EXACT same timestamp in different areas and have the same ratio's of votes being reported. Not the same number, but the percentage difference between them, because it's not just balancing votes in one county, it's balancing them across all counties and precincts within those counties. So the algorithm is basically going "Ok, Trump is getting ahead, we need to flip X number of votes to Biden, and we'll do it here, and here, and there", all on the fly.

But it goes deeper than just percentage differences. The "wheel" system really is the key to understanding how the whole thing works. And wheel systems are artificial constructs, they don't just happen naturally, especially not with something as chaotic as counting shuffled votes. When people get in line to vote or put their ballots in a mail box or ballot box, it's no different than shuffling a deck of cards. That's exactly why it's impossible to have a machine suddenly report a stack of a hundred thousand votes for Biden.

You can think of the "wheel" as a load balancing mechanism. it's always trying to find equilibrium at a specific point, and rather than teeter totter with two big blocks, it's teetering thousands of tiny blocks on each end of the scale and moving them around to try to find the balance it's looking for. Those blocks represent every location where voting machines are counting votes.

When they update votes, they don't just spread it across just one machine either, they spread it across every machine in a given region. So if they've got 20 machines in a given area, and they want to shift 20,000 votes for Biden, they will distribute that across all the machines in the area (not necessarily evenly).