Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The problem is still this

Most of these conservative sites require advertising to stay alive.

Advertisers don’t like to advertise on right leaning places because of cancel culture on the left

The left engages in cancel culture while the right does not.

This leads to ads and advertisers being pulled from right supporting websites because the left engages in a smear campaign.

Unless the right organizes and either personally funds these sites or fight back against cancel culture forcing companies to become politically neutral, then these platforms are short lived.

Let me give you a excerpt from a somewhat related article

they are motivated to self-censor news and information, lest they draw the wrath of the mobs. One editorial figure at a major international publication who did not want to be identified recounted numerous pieces he has recently killed for fear of the organized backlash. “They can bankrupt me,” he tells me. “Facebook, Twitter, Google— they can ruin you in a matter of hours. For somebody like us, they can destroy you. So what do we do? We pull our punches. To raise certain issues is to cut your own throat.” He continues, “The newsman in me says, ‘Tell the truth,’ and that sounds great. But if I do that and destroy [my publication] in the process, what kind of pyrrhic victory is that?”

106 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

The problem is still this

Most of these conservative sites require advertising to stay alive.

Advertisers don’t like to advertise on right leaning places because of cancel culture on the left

The left engages in cancel culture while the right does not.

This leads to ads and advertisers being pulled from right supporting websites because the left engages in a smear campaign.

Unless the right organizes and either personally funds these sites or fight back against cancel culture forcing companies to become politically neutral, then these platforms are short lived.

Let me give you a excerpt from a somewhat related article

they are motivated to self-censor news and information, lest they draw the wrath of the mobs. One editorial figure at a major international publication who did not want to be identified recounted numerous pieces he has recently killed for fear of the organized backlash.

“They can bankrupt me,” he tells me. “Facebook, Twitter, Google— they can ruin you in a matter of hours. For somebody like us, they can destroy you. So what do we do? We pull our punches. To raise certain issues is to cut your own throat.” He continues, “The newsman in me says, ‘Tell the truth,’ and that sounds great. But if I do that and destroy [my publication] in the process, what kind of pyrrhic victory is that?”

106 days ago
1 score