Yes.
But men are at fault too. This is how.
Women like and need men and always will. Men have fallen into the pleasures of unmarried sex, and have sold their birthright for a mess.
If men disdained any woman who wasn't, well a Woman with a capital W and a Lady with an even more capital L, and marriage material, the women would have to change.
But they don't. The men go along.
Women cannot do without male company and attention. What women are, men have either made them, or accepted. Maybe with annoyance, but accepted.
It's a man's world. That means if it's a stinky world, men are responsible for that.
The women's movement was really a dust-up between one group of men and another group of men, with the women merely naive props.
Yes.
But men are at fault too. This is how.
Women like and need men and always will. Men have fallen into the pleasures of unmarried sex, and have sold their birthright for a mess.
If men disdained any woman who wasn't, well a Woman with a capital W and a Lady with an even more capital L, and marriage material, the women would have to change.
But they don't. The men go along.
Women cannot do without male company and attention. What women are, men have either made them, or accepted. Maybe with annoyance, but accepted.
It's a man's world. That means if it's a stinky world, men are responsible for that. l
The women's movement was really a dust-up between one group of men and another group of men, with the women merely naive props.
Yes.
But men are at fault too. This is how.
Women like and need men and always will. Men have fallen into the pleasures of unmarried sex, and have sold their birthright for a mess.
If men disdained any woman who wasn't, well a Woman with a capital W and a Lady with an even more capital L, and marriage material, the women would have to change.
But they don't. The men go along.
Women cannot do without men. What women are, men have either made them, or accepted. Maybe with annoyance, but accepted.
It's a man's world.
The women's movement was really a dust-up between one group of men and another group of men, with the women as naive props.
Yes.
But men are at fault too. This is how.
Women like and need men and always will. Men have fallen into the pleasures of unmarried sex, and have sold their birthright for a mess.
If men disdained any woman who wasn't, well a Woman with a capital W and a Lady with an even more capital L, and marriage material, the women would have to change.
But they don't. They go along.
Women cannot do without men. What women are, men have either made them, or accepted. Maybe with annoyance, but accepted.
It's a man's world.
The women's movement was really a dust-up between one group of men and another group of men, with the women as naive props.
Yes. But men are at fault too. This is how. But women like and need men and always will. Men have fallen into the pleasures of unmarried sex, and have sold their birthright for a mess.
If men disdained any woman who wasn't, well a Woman with a capital W and a Lady with an even more capital L, and marriage material, the women would have to change.
Women cannot do without men. What women are, men have either made them, or accepted. Maybe with annoyance, but accepted.
It's a man's world.
The women's movement was really a dust-up between one group of men and another group of men, with the women as naive props.
Yes. But men are at fault too. This is how. But women like and need men and always will. Men have fallen into the pleasures of unmarried sex, and have sold their birthright for a mess.
If men disdained any woman who wasn't, well a Woman with a capital W and a Lady with an even more capital L, and marriage material, the women would have to change.
Women cannot do without men. What women are, men have either made them, or accepted. Maybe with annoyance, but accepted.
It's a man's world.
The women's movement was really a dust-up between one group of men and another group of men, with the women as naive props.