Many people dont talk about it, because they don't know about it. They only know what they were told. Others that may know about it, keep their mouths shut because they dont want the hardships that come from talking openly about it. Even trying to research it is tricky because damn near every source is considered nazi propaganda or from holocaust deniers.
Are they labeled as such because the accusations are true, or is it calculated slander to keep people from looking at what they present? We can only learn by looking for ourselves, but by doing so, you risk being slandered yourself.
Many people dont talk about it, because they don't know about it. They only know what they were told. Others that may know about it, keep their mouths shut because they dont want the hardships that come from talking openly about it. Even trying to research it is tricky because damn near every source is considered nazi propaganda or from holocaust deniers.
Are they labeled as such because the accusations are true, or is it calculated slander to keep people from looking at what they present? We can only learn by looking for ourselves, but by doing so, you risk being slandered yourself.
Many people dont talk about it, because they don't know about it. They only know what they were told. Others that may know about it, keep their mouths shut because they dont want the hardships that come from talking openly about it. Even trying to research it is tricky because damn near every source is considered nazi propaganda or from holocaust deniers.
Are they labeled as such because the accusations are true, or is it calculated slander to keep people from looking at what they present? We can only learn by looking for ourselves, but by doing so, you risk being slandered yourself.
Take this quote for example,
They talk about press freedom, when in fact all these newspapers have one owner and the owner, in any case, is the sponsor. This press then shapes public opinion. These political parties don't have any differences at all... "
... It is a small rootless international clique that is turning the people against each other, that does not want them to have peace..."
Does that ring true today? If I had mentioned who said it before it was read, many would have dismissed it and not allow the words to register. I won't write his name here, because it brings people to the surface with wild accusations. It's no secret and easy to figure out, but I'm not going to dignify him by mentioning his name. Nonetheless, his statement is as true today as it was some 80 years ago.
Some VERY interesting things are discovered if one is willing to read and look into testimony. It's hard to even process at first, but what one has to keep at the front of your mind is this. We are lied to daily and told what to see, even when we have evidence showing something completely different than their forced narrative.
If Kyle Rittenhouse had happened 30 years ago, we would have accepted the white supremacist mass shooter narrative without a second thought. We now have the ability to capture hundreds of videos from different perspectives showing the truth, and yet they still try and spread lies with propaganda.
This isnt the first time in history they've done it, its just the first time there's been mass awareness and proof to their lies and propaganda. We MUST learn from our past to see what was narrative and what was truth.