Why would it be surprising that there would be precincts in ratios which are nice and even? Remember, the video author is picking the ratios from whatever the data presents. He’s not looking for a specific ratio. No, he’s sorting his ratios and then rolling through them until he finds a nice even one and then grabs it and says LOOK! Of course you’ll find some nice even ratios among a large amount of precincts at each update.

It doesn’t strike me as odd at all that there could be at a given time a precinct that has 53 Trump votes and 212 Biden votes and another with 77 Trump votes and 308 Biden votes and both happen to be 1:4 ratios. So what?

And then a little while later the counts are updated and those are now 71 Trump and 230 Biden and 92 Trump and 350 Biden, respectively, neither of which are 1:4, so they disappear from your ratio sorted list. But low and behold 3 other precincts, when they are updated, happen to have 1:4 ratios. Look, the ratios “transferred.”. Whatever that means.

The guy is literally just poking through this data and finding precincts that do this and then saying LOOK FRAUD, even though that is not evidence of anything but changing vote totals in the precincts where the ratios don’t hold steady across updates (which is exactly what you would expect to happen). Then he finds ratios that have prime numbers and makes a big deal about it, like there’s something magical about primes? Why does he do this? Because a lot of people have a recollection that primes are special (which they are mathematically speaking) and so imbue them with some special significance, although they have no significance here. There’s no special reason for Dominion to cheat here using prime number ratios, and I’ll note this guy doesn’t limit himself to prime ratios. He points at non-prime ratios too. Really any ratios he can find when he sorts his data by ratio. Primes are used in cryptography, and so they sound super top secret and people with conspiratorial minds immediately latch on and go, OMG PRIMES!

I’ll say it again — if you don’t understand it, you shouldn’t put any stock in it, and you definitely shouldn’t post it or forward it to people, thereby endorsing it.

Why would it be surprising that there would be precincts in ratios which are nice and even? Remember, the video author is picking the ratios. He’s scrolling around looking for a ratio. Then when he finds it he goes LOOK!

It doesn’t strike me as odd at all that there could be at a given time a precinct that has 53 Trump votes and 212 Biden votes and another with 77 Trump votes and 308 Biden votes and both happen to be 1:4 ratios. So what?

And then a little while later the counts are updated and those are now 71 Trump and 230 Biden and 92 Trump and 350 Biden, respectively, neither of which are 1:4, so they disappear from your ratio sorted list. But low and behold 3 other precincts, when they are updated, happen to have 1:4 ratios. Look, the ratios “transferred.”. Whatever that means.

The guy is literally just poking through this data and finding precincts that do this and then saying LOOK FRAUD, even though that is not evidence of anything but changing vote totals in the precincts where the ratios don’t hold steady across updates (which is exactly what you would expect to happen). Then he finds ratios that have prime numbers and makes a big deal about it, like there’s something magical about primes? Why does he do this? Because a lot of people have a recollection that primes are special (which they are mathematically speaking) and so imbue them with some special significance, although they have no significance here. There’s no special reason for Dominion to cheat here using prime number ratios, and I’ll note this guy doesn’t limit himself to prime ratios. He points at non-prime ratios too. Really any ratios he can find when he sorts his data by ratio. Primes are used in cryptography, and so they sound super top secret and people with conspiratorial minds immediately latch on and go, OMG PRIMES!

I’ll say it again — if you don’t understand it, you shouldn’t put any stock in it, and you definitely shouldn’t post it or forward it to people, thereby endorsing it.

Why would it be surprising that there would be precincts in ratios which are nice and even? Remember, the video author is picking the ratios. He’s scrolling around looking for a ratio. Then when he finds it he goes LOOK!

It doesn’t strike me as odd at all that there could be at a given time a precinct that has 53 Trump votes and 212 Biden votes and another with 77 Trump votes and 308 Biden votes and both happen to be 1:4 ratios. So what?

And then a little while later the counts are updated and those are now 71 Trump and 230 Biden and 92 Trump and 350 Biden, respectively, neither of which are 1:4, so they disappear from your ratio sorted list. But low and behold 3 other precincts, when they are updated, happen to have 1:4 ratios. Look, the ratios “transferred.”. Whatever that means.

The guy is literally just poking through this data and finding precincts that do this and then saying LOOK FRAUD, even though that is not evidence of anything but changing vote totals in the precincts where the ratios don’t hold steady across updates (which is exactly what you would expect to happen). Then he finds ratios that have prime numbers and makes a big deal about it, like there’s something magical about primes? Why does he do this? Because a lot of people have a recollection that primes are special (which they are mathematically speaking) and so imbue them with some special significance, although they have no significance here. There’s no special reason for Dominion to cheat here using prime number ratios, and I’ll note this guy doesn’t limit himself to prime ratios. He points at non-prime ratios too. Really any ratios he can find when he sorts his data by ratio. Primes are used in cryptography, and so they sound super top secret and people with conspiratorial minds immediately latch on and go, OMG PRIMES!

I’ll say it again — if you don’t understand it, you shouldn’t put any stock in it, and you definitely shouldn’t forward it to people, thereby endorsing it.

Why would it be surprising that there would be precincts in ratios which are nice and even? Remember, the video author is picking the ratios. He’s scrolling around looking for a ratio. Then when he finds it he goes LOOK!

It doesn’t strike me as odd at all that there could be at a given time a precinct that has 53 Trump votes and 212 Biden votes and another with 77 Trump votes and 308 Biden votes and both happen to be 1:4 ratios. So what?

And then a little while later the counts are updated and those are now 71 Trump and 230 Biden and 92 Trump and 350 Biden, respectively, neither of which are 1:4, so they disappear from your ratio sorted list. But low and behold 3 other precincts, when they are updated, happen to have 1:4 ratios. Look, the ratios “transferred.”. Whatever that means.

The guy is literally just poking through this data and finding precincts that do this and then saying LOOK FRAUD, even though that is not evidence of anything but changing vote totals in the precincts where the ratios don’t hold steady across updates (which is exactly what you would expect to happen). Then he finds ratios that have prime numbers and makes a big deal about it, like there’s something magical about primes? Why does he do this? Because a lot of people have a recollection that primes are special (which they are mathematically speaking) and so imbue them with some special significance, although they have no significance here. There’s no reason for Dominion to cheat using prime number ratios here, and I’ll note this guy doesn’t limit himself to prime ratios. He points at non-prime ratios too. Primes are used in cryptography, and so people with conspiratorial minds immediately go, OMG PRIMES!

I’ll say it again — if you don’t understand it, you shouldn’t put any stock in it.

Why would it be surprising that there would be precincts in ratios which are nice and even? Remember, the video author is picking the ratios. He’s scrolling around looking for a ratio. Then when he finds it he goes LOOK!

It doesn’t strike me as odd at all that there could be at a given time a precinct that has 53 Trump votes and 212 Biden votes and another with 77 Trump votes and 308 Biden votes and both happen to be 1:4 ratios. So what?

And then a little while later the counts are updated and those are now 71 Trump and 230 Biden and 92 Trump and 350 Biden, respectively, neither of which are 1:4, so they disappear from your ratio sorted list. But low and behold 3 other precincts, when they are updated, happen to have 1:4 ratios. Look, the ratios “transferred.”. Whatever that means.

The guy is literally just poking through this data and finding precincts that do this and then saying LOOK FRAUD. Then he finds ratios that have prime numbers and makes a big deal about it, like there’s something magical about primes? Why does he do this? Because a lot of people have a recollection that primes are special (which they are mathematically speaking) and so imbue them with some special significance, although they have no significance here. There’s no reason for Dominion to cheat using prime number ratios here, and I’ll note this guy doesn’t limit himself to prime ratios. He points at non-prime ratios too. Primes are used in cryptography, and so people with conspiratorial minds immediately go, OMG PRIMES!

I’ll say it again — if you don’t understand it, you shouldn’t put any stock in it.