No. Its the article you linked. The writer of the article clearly didn't read the statement that was cited. This tweet was the source to their claim: https://twitter.com/AGJeffLandry/status/1336414026033733633?s=20

Which links to this statement straight from the Louisiana AG's website: http://agjefflandry.com/Article/10825

No. Its the article you linked. The writer of the article clearly didn't read the statement that was cited. This tweet was the source to their claim: https://twitter.com/AGJeffLandry/status/1336414026033733633?s=20

Which links to this statement from the Louisiana AG's website: http://agjefflandry.com/Article/10825

Straight from AG Jeff Laundry himself: "Only the U.S. Supreme Court can ultimately decide cases of real controversy among the states under our Constitution. That is why the Justices should hear and decide the case which we have joined representing the citizens of Louisiana.

Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court should consider the most recent Texas motion, which contains some of the same arguments."

No. Its the article you linked. The writer of the article clearly didn't read the statement that was cited. This tweet was the source to their claim: https://twitter.com/AGJeffLandry/status/1336414026033733633?s=20

Which links to this statement straight from the Louisiana AG's website: http://agjefflandry.com/Article/10825

Straight from AG Jeff Laundry himself .