I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation with SCOTUS, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification if the outcome calls for it, making the original certification null and void anyways. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation with SCOTUS, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certificatio if the outcome calls for it, making the initial certification null and void anyways. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation with SCOTUS, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something while the case is still pending/active/a judgment has not yet been made. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when a person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something before the court makes a final judgment on their case. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese/protocol regarding these lawsuits, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when the person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something before the court makes a final judgment on their case. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. The media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Since most of us aren’t familiar with the legalese surrounding this, context and additional info are so incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when the person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something before the court makes a final judgment on their case. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully) so words with negative connotations can drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE” but I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. Most of us aren’t familiar with how this all works to begin with so context and additional info is incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). The fake news media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump and they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us so now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when the person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something before the court makes a final judgment on their case. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully), some even have no hope left, so words with negative connotations drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE”. Then I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. Most of us aren’t familiar with how this all works to begin with so context and additional info is incredibly important to have (especially when it comes to litigation). The fake news media is constantly trying to invalidate Trump so they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us so now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when the person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something before the court makes a final judgment on their case. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully), some even have no hope left, so words with negative connotations drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE”. Then I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap. ESPECIALLY with litigation, context is imperative to have. Most of us aren’t familiar with how this all works so it can get very confusing. To add, fake news is constantly trying to invalidate Trump so they’ll cherry-pick info to try and mislead us. Now more than ever, we have to take a deep breath and look into it more before giving headlines like “SCOTUS REJECTS LAWSUIT TRUMP IS A LOSER YET AGAIN” any of our energy, lol.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when the person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something before the court makes a final judgment on their case. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.

I think it’s because they hear “rejection” and don’t know what is being rejected. I think everyone is a little stressed about the outcome (rightfully), some even have no hope left, so words with negative connotations drive people over the edge lol. Admittedly, I also had an emotional knee-jerk reaction when I saw posts/headlines saying “SCOTUS REJECTS PA CASE”. Then I looked into it and realized I fell for a fake news trap.

I’m no lawyer so forgive my potentially shit explanation but emergency injunctive relief is when the person asks the judge for something/a person is required to do something before the court makes a final judgment on their case. Usually these are granted if the person is at risk of severe harm/damages/monetary loss and it’s meant to stop that from happening. For example: if you’re taking your crazy stalker ex to court, you’d likely ask for a temporary restraining order in the meantime until the case is settled because you’re worried he/she might try to kill/harm you. So in this situation, they were asking to not certify the results. SCOTUS rejected that request because there is no risk of severe harm/damages (aside from my blood pressure skyrocketing from stressing over this outcome) and SCOTUS can overrule the certification anyways, making it null and void. It’s essentially redundant/unnecessary.