Okay, so there's a lot to unpack from your comment (it's crazy long, though that's not a bad thing). Also, I'll preface this with I am but one pede and can only provide my own observations and explanations.

I didn't become red-pilled because I engaged with others. I became red-pilled because I found more and more that just about everything I've been taught since I was a child was a lie or a narrative pushed. The evidence is out there if you start digging. You can't expect to be handed everything on a silver platter. The best way is to do your own research. Unfortunately, big tech is making that harder and harder these days. Don't use Google. Don't use major news outlets. All of them have an agenda to push or money to make. Or do and compare them to original sources--you'll get your answers.

Now on to your points:

But there is a shitload of things that's absolutely disqualifying. Nepotism, blaming systematically the other side, qualifying anyone you disagree with as a pedo-commy, devilizing your adversaries, being consensual with authoritarians, the lies, climate-change position.

Nepotism, are you referring to Trump and his son-in-law or sons? And while Democrats are to blame for a lot, most of this site acknowledges the uniparty and hates them too. It's less Republicans vs Democrats as it is pro-America vs Anti-America. It's hard not to "devilize" your adversaries when they are actively trying to erode your rights, put you and your family in reeducation camps, or simply wish for your death. Consensual with authoritarians--can you expand on that? Because that's exactly what most of this site is against. Lies--that's really vague. Climate change--there is an abundance of evidence from actual geologists, chemists, and scientists that shows that the mainstream version of climate change is simply incorrect. The planet has cycles of heating and cooling that also correlate with the amount of CO2. What needs CO2 to create more oxygen?

But the worse thing is the cognitive dissonances, the mental gymnastics, the hypocrisy. To me, it disqualifies many points you try to make. For example, there are frequent posts here about how you folks have the best gays. Alright, some gays support Trump, that's cool. But the patterns in the comments are incredible. First comment : fuck yeah we have the best gays, gays are based yadayada. Second or third comment will be a shortcut relating homosexuality to pedophilia. You can't red-pill anyone if you tolerate that. Not because it's not ok to associate gay to pedophilia, I don't think that but you folks COULD. But you tolerate hypocrisy, inconsistency within your ranks on HUGE subjects. This very post right now ("fag-commies") links homosexuality to communism. Why ? Is that necessary ? What if I'm gay, would I feel welcomed here. Inconsistent positions.

So your complaint is that we're not a hive mind? That's the beauty of free speech. If you disagree with someone's statement, request their sources so you can come to your own conclusion. I do that all the time. There are plenty of times I've disagreed with people on this site. Fag-commie--it's fun to say. Most everywhere else you will get banned for saying words that hurt people's ever-increasingly delicate feelings. Don't take it so seriously. We have plenty of gay folks here that don't take offense to it.

Or about the virus? It's chinese. It's fake. It's not fake but it's a flu, harmless. It's not harmless but it doesn't kill. It kills but it's only people with pre-conditions. Ok when hospital are overwhelmed it kills much more, but harming the economy kills more. Ok we don't need a evil vaccine. But GEOTUS had the best plan regarding vaccine distribution. For a virus that disappeared by miracle, in April, and also or around the corner, or on 5 November just after the election. Or not. There is currently on the front page one post about hydroxychloroquine. WTF guys, hydroxychloroquine doesn't work, take a step back. So my point is not that these points are false, or irrelevant, or lies. What I'm saying is they are hypocrite, inconsistent positions. You can't convince anyone with inconsistent positions.

Again, we're not a hive mind. We all have our different opinions regarding it. Usually because we've all done different levels of research. I find it funny that you say we're not believable because our positions are inconsistent, but what about the mainstream propaganda media? They've been inconsistent throughout the entire thing yet people believe them. And again, they have an agenda and money to be made off of that.

I may reply more later, but your overarching point/complaint seems to be that we're inconsistent.

Thing is we're not one person. We're not one entity with one solid position. We're a bunch of humans who make errors, disagree with each other, and come from all walks of life. The one thing we all agree on is our support for President Trump. That's the beauty of this site. We may agree on the overarching idea of something, but there can be thousands of ways to get there.

UPDATE:

Or science in general, yesterday, thousands of upvotes for someone spamming that the new vaccines rewrite DNA. This is uneducated, batshit craziness. But you always pretend you value and understand science and scientists better than the left. Climate change, there are, I guess, consistent positions to decide on not fighting it, or not fighting it like we are asked by global institutions. That would make sense. I might not agree, but I could see it. But this is not the case here, this is not Trump and this forum position. On the front-page right now, the same climate-change chinese hoax, always a plebiscite. Why ? Inconsistent positions.

You say that's uneducated batshit craziness. Why? There have been numerous doctors coming forward warning us about this. For years now actually. Are you saying that there's only one correct analysis or opinion when it comes to science or the medical field? Have you ever stopped to think about the bigger picture? Follow the money. They're not quiet about their ambitions either.

Or the double standard in general. About how you enjoyed Trump pointing out, during the debate, that Biden couldn't work across the aisle, but you guys love Mitch McConnel. How biased MSM treats information, guys, come on, it's as bad here or on the networks you value, if not worse. How tough you are regarding Biden children, but not with Trump children. How concerned you are with Democrat corruption, but Trump giving up his salary convinces too many of you he can't be corrupt. How important it is to look into pedophilia when it's a D, not when it's Barr or another R. How quick you are to dismiss accusation to Trump being corrupt, how quick you were to look into Clinton, Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Warren and Sanders wealth. Sure, they are leftists, so are they supposed to stay poor, to redistribute 100% of their wealth, what kind of fallacious strawman it is to pretend that Sanders should give 100% of his salary and mansions to the people? It's as honest as saying Trump only cares about the stock market since he is rich. How the left is always "projecting" their arguments. This is the worse ; for most of your attacks, you could swap left and right and the point would be the same, that's how shallow these points look. Inconsistent positions.

Lol you obviously haven't lurked long if you think we love Mitch McConnell. We appreciate him when he does the right thing, but we also acknowledge he is a swamp creature that can't be trusted. The cocaine mitch and apex predator jokes are memes. We don't pretend to be unbiased or openly broadcast lies to the American public to serve our own interests like the MSM does. That comparison is laughable. Did Trump's children serve as a proxy to do questionable deals with our supposed adversaries and then funnel that money to Trump? Last I checked that wasn't the case. If it was, you can guarantee people on here wouldn't like it. I don't care much for Ivanka, but at least she didn't sell the nation out to China or Ukraine. They're not supposed to stay poor, but they're also not supposed to get rich as a public servant. That's a red flag for corruption. Trump made his money as a business man. If he did dirty dealing, then yeah, I would like to know about it. But he didn't make his money while working in a public office. HUGE difference. Anyone can get rich off the stock market and that's a big sign of the health of our economy.

It sounds like you need to lurk more, take your feelings out of it, and do some research. The only one who can ultimately red-pill you is yourself.

I appreciate you trying to get answers though. That's the first step.

Okay, so there's a lot to unpack from your comment (it's crazy long, though that's not a bad thing). Also, I'll preface this with I am but one pede and can only provide my own observations and explanations.

I didn't become red-pilled because I engaged with others. I became red-pilled because I found more and more that just about everything I've been taught since I was a child was a lie or a narrative pushed. The evidence is out there if you start digging. You can't expect to be handed everything on a silver platter. The best way is to do your own research. Unfortunately, big tech is making that harder and harder these days. Don't use Google. Don't use major news outlets. All of them have an agenda to push or money to make. Or do and compare them to original sources--you'll get your answers.

Now on to your points:

But there is a shitload of things that's absolutely disqualifying. Nepotism, blaming systematically the other side, qualifying anyone you disagree with as a pedo-commy, devilizing your adversaries, being consensual with authoritarians, the lies, climate-change position.

Nepotism, are you referring to Trump and his son-in-law or sons? And while Democrats are to blame for a lot, most of this site acknowledges the uniparty and hates them too. It's less Republicans vs Democrats as it is pro-America vs Anti-America. It's hard not to "devilize" your adversaries when they are actively trying to erode your rights, put you and your family in reeducation camps, or simply wish for your death. Consensual with authoritarians--can you expand on that? Because that's exactly what most of this site is against. Lies--that's really vague. Climate change--there is an abundance of evidence from actual geologists, chemists, and scientists that shows that the mainstream version of climate change is simply incorrect. The planet has cycles of heating and cooling that also correlate with the amount of CO2. What needs CO2 to create more oxygen?

But the worse thing is the cognitive dissonances, the mental gymnastics, the hypocrisy. To me, it disqualifies many points you try to make. For example, there are frequent posts here about how you folks have the best gays. Alright, some gays support Trump, that's cool. But the patterns in the comments are incredible. First comment : fuck yeah we have the best gays, gays are based yadayada. Second or third comment will be a shortcut relating homosexuality to pedophilia. You can't red-pill anyone if you tolerate that. Not because it's not ok to associate gay to pedophilia, I don't think that but you folks COULD. But you tolerate hypocrisy, inconsistency within your ranks on HUGE subjects. This very post right now ("fag-commies") links homosexuality to communism. Why ? Is that necessary ? What if I'm gay, would I feel welcomed here. Inconsistent positions.

So your complaint is that we're not a hive mind? That's the beauty of free speech. If you disagree with someone's statement, request their sources so you can come to your own conclusion. I do that all the time. There are plenty of times I've disagreed with people on this site. Fag-commie--it's fun to say. Most everywhere else you will get banned for saying words that hurt people's ever-increasingly delicate feelings. Don't take it so seriously. We have plenty of gay folks here that don't take offense to it.

Or about the virus? It's chinese. It's fake. It's not fake but it's a flu, harmless. It's not harmless but it doesn't kill. It kills but it's only people with pre-conditions. Ok when hospital are overwhelmed it kills much more, but harming the economy kills more. Ok we don't need a evil vaccine. But GEOTUS had the best plan regarding vaccine distribution. For a virus that disappeared by miracle, in April, and also or around the corner, or on 5 November just after the election. Or not. There is currently on the front page one post about hydroxychloroquine. WTF guys, hydroxychloroquine doesn't work, take a step back. So my point is not that these points are false, or irrelevant, or lies. What I'm saying is they are hypocrite, inconsistent positions. You can't convince anyone with inconsistent positions.

Again, we're not a hive mind. We all have our different opinions regarding it. Usually because we've all done different levels of research. I find it funny that you say we're not believable because our positions are inconsistent, but what about the mainstream propaganda media? They've been inconsistent throughout the entire thing yet people believe them. And again, they have an agenda and money to be made off of that.

I may reply more later, but your overarching point/complaint seems to be that we're inconsistent.

Thing is we're not one person. We're not one entity with one solid position. We're a bunch of humans who make errors, disagree with each other, and come from all walks of life. The one thing we all agree on is our support for President Trump. That's the beauty of this site. We may agree on the overarching idea of something, but there can be thousands of ways to get there.

Or science in general, yesterday, thousands of upvotes for someone spamming that the new vaccines rewrite DNA. This is uneducated, batshit craziness. But you always pretend you value and understand science and scientists better than the left. Climate change, there are, I guess, consistent positions to decide on not fighting it, or not fighting it like we are asked by global institutions. That would make sense. I might not agree, but I could see it. But this is not the case here, this is not Trump and this forum position. On the front-page right now, the same climate-change chinese hoax, always a plebiscite. Why ? Inconsistent positions.

You say that's uneducated batshit craziness. Why? There have been numerous doctors coming forward warning us about this. For years now actually. Are you saying that there's only one correct analysis or opinion when it comes to science or the medical field? Have you ever stopped to think about the bigger picture? Follow the money. They're not quiet about their ambitions either.

It sounds like you need to lurk more, take your feelings out of it, and do some research. The only one who can ultimately red-pill you is yourself.

I appreciate you trying to get answers though. That's the first step.

Okay, so there's a lot to unpack from your comment (it's crazy long, though that's not a bad thing). Also, I'll preface this with I am but one pede and can only provide my own observations and explanations.

I didn't become red-pilled because I engaged with others. I became red-pilled because I found more and more that just about everything I've been taught since I was a child was a lie or a narrative pushed. The evidence is out there if you start digging. You can't expect to be handed everything in a silver platter. The best way is to do your own research. Unfortunately, big tech is making that harder and harder these days. Don't use Google. Don't use major news outlets. All of them have an agenda to push or money to make. Or do and compare them to original sources--you'll get your answers.

Now on to your points:

But there is a shitload of things that's absolutely disqualifying. Nepotism, blaming systematically the other side, qualifying anyone you disagree with as a pedo-commy, devilizing your adversaries, being consensual with authoritarians, the lies, climate-change position.

Nepotism, are you referring to Trump and his son-in-law or sons? And while Democrats are to blame for a lot, most of this site acknowledges the uniparty and hates them too. It's less Republicans vs Democrats as it is pro-America vs Anti-America. It's hard not to "devilize" your adversaries when they are actively trying to erode your rights, put you and your family in reeducation camps, or simply wish for your death. Consensual with authoritarians--can you expand on that? Because that's exactly what most of this site is against. Lies--that's really vague. Climate change--there is an abundance of evidence from actually geologists and scientists that shows that the mainstream version of climate change is simply incorrect. The planet has cycles of heating and cooling that also correlate with the amount of CO2. What needs CO2 to create more oxygen?

But the worse thing is the cognitive dissonances, the mental gymnastics, the hypocrisy. To me, it disqualifies many points you try to make. For example, there are frequent posts here about how you folks have the best gays. Alright, some gays support Trump, that's cool. But the patterns in the comments are incredible. First comment : fuck yeah we have the best gays, gays are based yadayada. Second or third comment will be a shortcut relating homosexuality to pedophilia. You can't red-pill anyone if you tolerate that. Not because it's not ok to associate gay to pedophilia, I don't think that but you folks COULD. But you tolerate hypocrisy, inconsistency within your ranks on HUGE subjects. This very post right now ("fag-commies") links homosexuality to communism. Why ? Is that necessary ? What if I'm gay, would I feel welcomed here. Inconsistent positions.

So your complaint is that we're not a hive mind? That's the beauty of free speech. If you disagree with someone's statement, request their sources so you can come to your own conclusion. I do that all the time. There are plenty of times I've disagreed with people on this site. Fag-commie--it's fun to say. Most everywhere else you will get banned for saying words that hurt people's ever-increasingly delicate feelings. Don't take it so seriously. We have plenty of gay folks here that don't take offense to it.

Or about the virus? It's chinese. It's fake. It's not fake but it's a flu, harmless. It's not harmless but it doesn't kill. It kills but it's only people with pre-conditions. Ok when hospital are overwhelmed it kills much more, but harming the economy kills more. Ok we don't need a evil vaccine. But GEOTUS had the best plan regarding vaccine distribution. For a virus that disappeared by miracle, in April, and also or around the corner, or on 5 November just after the election. Or not. There is currently on the front page one post about hydroxychloroquine. WTF guys, hydroxychloroquine doesn't work, take a step back. So my point is not that these points are false, or irrelevant, or lies. What I'm saying is they are hypocrite, inconsistent positions. You can't convince anyone with inconsistent positions.

Again, we're not a hive mind. We all have our different opinions regarding it. Usually because we've all done different levels of research. I find it funny that you say we're not believable because our positions are inconsistent, but what about the mainstream propaganda media? They've been inconsistent throughout the entire thing yet people believe them. And again, they have an agenda and money to be made off of that.

I may reply more later, but your overarching point/complaint seems to be that we're inconsistent.

Thing is we're not one person. We're not one entity with one solid position. We're a bunch of humans who make errors, disagree with each other, and come from all walks of life. The one thing we all agree on is our support for President Trump. That's the beauty of this site. We may agree on the overarching idea of something, but there can be thousands of ways to get there.

It sounds like you need to lurk more, take your feelings out of it, and do some research. The only one who can ultimately red-pill you is yourself.

I appreciate you trying to get answers though. That's the first step.