Small, 15 page pdf. If it asks you to make an account, it's hosted here. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hOVBJ1BuPLUzyvH1zwMB6DVEnwX5tXbu/view?usp=drivesdk

If anyone with a good understanding, please read and explain it. I was under the assumption that these states violated other states voting process because the Governors bypassed the legislators. Doesn't this make out cases null?

"The Supreme Court, however, has provided a clear and unambiguous answer to this question, twice explaining that the term “Legislature” in the Elections Clause refers not just to a state's legislative body but more broadly to the entire lawmaking process of the state.

That a law was enacted by the people themselves, pursuant to state law, rather than by the state legislative body, is not enough to invalidate that action under the Elections Clause. The focus remains on the state's lawmaking process, whether the governor of the state participates in the making of state laws by exercising his veto power, or the people participate in the making of state laws through the state's referendum process."

Small, 15 page pdf. If it asks you to make an account, it's hosted here. https://gofile.io/d/ZnZqPk

If anyone with a good understanding, please read and explain it. I was under the assumption that these states violated other states voting process because the Governors bypassed the legislators. Doesn't this make out cases null?

"The Supreme Court, however, has provided a clear and unambiguous answer to this question, twice explaining that the term “Legislature” in the Elections Clause refers not just to a state's legislative body but more broadly to the entire lawmaking process of the state.

That a law was enacted by the people themselves, pursuant to state law, rather than by the state legislative body, is not enough to invalidate that action under the Elections Clause. The focus remains on the state's lawmaking process, whether the governor of the state participates in the making of state laws by exercising his veto power, or the people participate in the making of state laws through the state's referendum process."

Small PDF PAPER. If it asks you to make an account, it's hosted here. https://gofile.io/d/ZnZqPk

If anyone with a good understanding, please read and explain it. I was under the assumption that these states violated other states voting process because the Governors bypassed the legislators. Doesn't this make out cases null?

"The Supreme Court, however, has provided a clear and unambiguous answer to this question, twice explaining that the term “Legislature” in the Elections Clause refers not just to a state's legislative body but more broadly to the entire lawmaking process of the state.

That a law was enacted by the people themselves, pursuant to state law, rather than by the state legislative body, is not enough to invalidate that action under the Elections Clause. The focus remains on the state's lawmaking process, whether the governor of the state participates in the making of state laws by exercising his veto power, or the people participate in the making of state laws through the state's referendum process."

Small PDF PAPER. If it asks you to make an account, it's hosted here. https://gofile.io/d/ZnZqPk

"The Supreme Court, however, has provided a clear and unambiguous answer to this question, twice explaining that the term “Legislature” in the Elections Clause refers not just to a state's legislative body but more broadly to the entire lawmaking process of the state.

That a law was enacted by the people themselves, pursuant to state law, rather than by the state legislative body, is not enough to invalidate that action under the Elections Clause. The focus remains on the state's lawmaking process, whether the governor of the state participates in the making of state laws by exercising his veto power, or the people participate in the making of state laws through the state's referendum process."