Reason: None provided.
This is my favorite bit:
From next to last page:
Not acting incentivizes further lawlessness and will drive honest voters from the polls: why should anyone vote if a few urban centers will manufacture an unlawful and insuperable vote margin? Acting now, once, removes any incentive for future lawlessness. Injunctions and/or acts of executive fiat that undermine the lawful election process will cease if the Court acts now.
Chastened by this Court’s mandate,future non-legislative actors will know they must seek legislative ratification before an election for any changes to election procedures that they believe to be necessary or compelling.The public interest demands ending the abusive conduct that produced this dilemma.
This. This is something every common man can understand; punish bad behavior harshly which, in turn, prevents any future similar bad behavior. This should be at the forefront of any conversation about this election.
72 days ago
38 score
Reason: Original
This is my favorite bit:
From next to last page:
Not acting incentivizes further lawlessness and will drive honest voters from the polls: why should anyone vote if a few urban centers will manufacture an unlawful and insuperable vote margin? Acting now, once, removes any incentive for future lawlessness. Injunctions and/or acts of executive fiat that undermine the lawful election process will cease if the Court acts now.
Chastened by this Court’s mandate,future non-legislative actors will know they must seek legislative ratification before an election for any changes to election procedures that they believe to be necessary or compelling.The public interest demands ending the abusive conduct that produced this dilemma.
This. This is something every common man can understand; punish bad behavior harshly which, in turn, prevents any future similar bad behavior. and should be at the forefront of any conversation about this election.
72 days ago
1 score