Inaction would disenfranchise as many voters as taking action allegedly would.

[...]

Defendant States first assume that Mr. Biden won their States legitimately, then use that assumption to criticize Texas’s arguments for disenfranchising voters. If the flawed 2020 results stand, that result would disenfranchise voters. At best for Defendant States, the balance of equities could be neutral. But because Defendant States cannot—or at least do not—seriously defend the merits or show that Mr. Biden actually prevailed, the equities tip in favor of Texas and of the lawful process for resolving contested elections.

Don't know why this isn't brought up more. Democrats are using circular reasoning here.

Defendant States first assume that Mr. Biden won their States legitimately, then use that assumption to criticize Texas’s arguments for disenfranchising voters. If the flawed 2020 results stand, that result would disenfranchise voters. At best for Defendant States, the balance of equities could be neutral. But because Defendant States cannot—or at least do not—seriously defend the merits or show that Mr. Biden actually prevailed, the equities tip in favor of Texas and of the lawful process for resolving contested elections.