Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: Fixed a typo

SCOTUS didn’t take the case because there is no precedent? There’s no precedent for massive cheating in 4 swing states either. There’s a first time for everything, and apparently SCOTUS decided they’d rather be expanded to 17 justices or whatever the fuck it is now.

155 days ago
3 score
Reason: Original

SCOTUS didn’t take the care because there is no precedent? There’s no precedent for massive cheating in 4 swing states either. There’s a first time for everything, and apparently SCOTUS decided they’d rather be expanded to 17 justices or whatever the fuck it is now.

155 days ago
1 score