Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

What I don't get in ALL of this is that it seems that the best, most reasonable "relief" either state or federal courts could provide is to allow for a full forensic audit/investigation of the questioned elections. I forget who said this prior, but basically you bring up the really shady stuff we've seen as probable cause then let discovery happen to allow the Trump Team to fully investigate things (people on the voter rolls who illegally voted, a look into signatures, reviewing chain of custody records, etc.).

I don't see how that is unreasonable. I'm not sure if it's that the Trump Team isn't requesting this particular thing (most of the featured motions basically just seemed for a call for an injunction against certification or a de facto "overturn the election results now") or courts are denying it. Can anyone clarify?

I understand this is a time consuming process but I don't think "Welp, there isn't enough time" is an excuse to NOT investigate rampant voter fraud. Like courts could say states are allowed to certify whatever they want, but if this investigation turns up anything substantial, that certification WILL be overturned, regardless of when it is.

124 days ago
3 score
Reason: Original

What I don't get in ALL of this is that it seems that the best, most reasonable "relief" either state or federal courts could provide is to allow for a full forensic audit/investigation of the questioned elections. I forget who said this prior, but basically you bring up the really shady stuff we've seen as probable cause then let discovery happen to allow the Trump Team to fully investigate things (people on the voter rolls who illegally voted, a look into signatures, reviewing chain of custody records, etc.).

I don't see how that is unreasonable. I'm not sure if it's that the Trump Team isn't requesting this particular thing (most of the featured motions basically just seemed for a call for an injunction against certification or a de facto "turn over the election results") or courts are denying it. Can anyone clarify?

I understand this is a time consuming process but I don't think "Welp, there isn't enough time" is an excuse to NOT investigate rampant voter fraud. Like courts could say states are allowed to certify whatever they want, but if this investigation turns up anything substantial, that certification WILL be overturned, regardless of when it is.

124 days ago
1 score