To original poster, does SCOTUS's ruling to amount to "States don't have to strictly abide by the Constitution anymore?" Am I missing something? (I don't understand the reason for its rejection.)

I know they rejected it based on its standing, but what does that mean? It sounds like they do not want to hear the case.

To original poster, does SCOTUS's ruling to amount to "States don't have to strictly abide by the Constitution anymore?" Am I missing something? (I don't understand the reason for its rejection.)

I mean, if a state cannot sue another state for breach of election law in the SCOTUS, then what venue is there for enforcing election law? Doesn't this make election law is meaningless?