Fuck if I know.

You're talking about an admin that is actively working against the swamp so they won't necessarily telegraph their feelings or intent to throw off their adversaries.

We haven't seen this level of political posturing... possibly ever in an obvious war between competing political juggernauts.

So all bets are off.

If you look into the SCOTUS ruling however, there is some interesting framing, it was not rejected outright, there was nuance to the rejection, that it did not have "Standing". A repeal at another time may give them standing once the votes are actually cast and there is tangible wrongdoing.

Also all 3 Trump justices refused to hear the motion. This may be a situation where they slow roll the ruling in order to minimize public outcry and minimize rioting. Could you imagine the optics if they all came out for trump in unison all at once? As painful as this ruling was and as much as we are hair trigger ready to defend our country from the commie hordes, this ruling was almost mandatory if you really think about it, to safeguard the legitimacy of the court for the future.

One thing should strike everyone. Nothing happens without purpose in the Trump admin, there is subtlety and messaging everywhere, sometimes overtly, sometimes not, as every move they make fits into a larger strategy. It's never so simple as a thrown out court case. They move with purpose. This is not a song and dance like we have become accustomed to, and that is what has prevented many from seeing a broader picture of politics as it evolves from its prior crude and purely symbolic form of prior administrations.

Fuck if I know.

You're talking about an admin that is actively working against the swamp so they won't necessarily telegraph their feelings or intent to throw off their adversaries.

We haven't seen this level of political posturing... possibly ever in an obvious war between competing political juggernauts.

So all bets are off.

If you look into the SCOTUS ruling however, there is some interesting framing, it was not rejected outright, there was nuance to the rejection, that it did not have "Standing". A repeal at another time may give them standing once the votes are actually cast and there is tangible wrongdoing.

Also all 3 Trump justices refused to hear the motion. This may be a situation where they slow roll the ruling in order to minimize public outcry and minimize rioting. Could you imagine the optics if they all came out for trump in unison all at once? As painful as this ruling was and as much as we are hair trigger ready to defend our country from the commie hordes, this ruling was almost mandatory if you really think about it, to safeguard the legitimacy of the court for the future.

One thing should strike everyone. Nothing happens without purpose in the Trump admin, there is subtlety and messaging everywhere, sometimes overtly, sometimes not, as every move they make fits into a larger strategy. It's never so simple as a thrown out court case. They move with purpose. This is not a song and dance like we have become accustomed to, and that is what has prevented many from seeing a broader picture of politics as it evolves from its prior crude and purely symbolic form of prior administrations.

Fuck if I know.

You're talking about an admin that is actively working against the swamp so they won't necessarily telegraph their feelings or intent to throw off their adversaries.

We haven't seen this level of political posturing... possibly ever in an obvious war between competing political juggernauts.

So all bets are off.

If you look into the SCOTUS ruling however, there is some interesting framing, it was not rejected outright, there was nuance to the rejection, that it did not have "Standing". A repeal at another time may give them standing once the votes are actually cast and there is tangible wrongdoing.

Also all 3 Trump justices refused to hear the motion. This may be a situation where they slow role the ruling in order to minimize public outcry and minimize rioting. Could you imagine the optics if they all came out for trump in unison all at once? As painful as this ruling was and as much as we are hair trigger ready to defend our country from the commie hordes, this ruling was almost mandatory if you really think about it, to safeguard the legitimacy of the court for the future.

One thing should strike everyone. Nothing happens without purpose in the Trump admin, there is subtlety and messaging everywhere, sometimes overtly, sometimes not, as every move they make fits into a larger strategy. It's never so simple as a thrown out court case. They move with purpose. This is not a song and dance like we have become accustomed to, and that is what has prevented many from seeing a broader picture of politics as it evolves from its prior crude and purely symbolic form of prior administrations.

Fuck if I know.

You're talking about an admin that is actively working against the swamp so they won't necessarily telegraph their feelings or intent to throw off their adversaries.

We haven't seen this level of political posturing... possibly ever in an obvious war between competing political juggernauts.

So all bets are off.

If you look into the SCOTUS ruling however, there is some interesting framing, it was not rejected outright, there was nuance to the rejection, that it did not have "Standing". A repeal at another time may give them standing once the votes are actually cast and there is tangible wrongdoing.

Also all 3 Trump justices refused to hear the motion. This may be a situation where they slow role the ruling in order to minimize public outcry and minimize rioting. Could you imagine the optics if they all came out for trump in unison all at once? As painful as this ruling was and as much as we are hair trigger ready to defend our country from the commie hordes, this ruling was almost mandatory if you really think about it, to safeguard the legitimacy of the court for the future.

One thing should strike everyone. Nothing happens without purpose in the Trump admin, there is subtlety and messaging everywhere, sometimes overtly, sometimes not, as every move they make fits into a larger strategy. It's never so simple as a thrown out court case. They move with purpose. This is not a song and dance like we have become accustomed to, and that is what has prevented many from seeing a broader picture of politics as it evolves from its prior crude and purely symbolic form of prior administrations.