Of course they have rights. But abusing the constitution is removing peoples' rights. I don't think he's listing purple hair in and of itself being unworthy of rights or lack of religion for that matter. If he is, I don't agree with his sentiments. I think, however, that he's alluding to a very specific group through a series of descriptions of their general ideology whose actions inherently disrespect others' rights. Idc if you are religious or not, for the record. I only care of the certain political ideologies that have proven time and time again to be less than fair for the people. It's one thing to do what you want. It's another to do what you want to others.

Of course they have rights. But abusing the constitution is removing peoples' rights. I don't think he's listing purple hair in and of itself being unworthy of rights or lack of religion for that matter. If he is, I don't agree with his sentiments. I think, however, that he's alluding to a very specific group through a series of descriptions of their general ideology whose actions inherently disrespect others' rights. Idc if you are religious or not, for the record. I only care of the certain political ideologies that have proven time and time again to be less than fair for the people. It's one thing to do what you want. It's another to do what you want to others.

Of course they have rights. But abusing the constitution is removing peoples' rights. I don't think he's listing purple hair in and of itself being unworthy of rights. If he is, I don't agree with his sentiments. I think, however, that he's alluding to a very specific group through a series of descriptions of their general ideology whose actions inherently disrespect others' rights. Idc if you are religious or not, for the record. I only care of the certain political ideologies that have proven time and time again to be less than fair for the people. It's one thing to do what you want. It's another to do what you want to others.