Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected, basically their vote wouldn't count but they made them think it would. That's potentially a valid case. Find some Dems and rep them too.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over. I actually recommend evaluating the double suit approach for all cases. A bad election official screws things up for everyone and if you consider the spitroast approach then you can have things intersect on them (like triangulating).

Politicians and officials are often only in it for themselves and everyone is an injured party. Have the wounded all gang bang them from every conceivable angle like a dick kracken having its way with a piece of swiss cheese until they are themselves officially screwed reduced to nothing more than dick cheese and that's the only thing that'll still be official about them.

125 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected, basically their vote wouldn't count but they made them think it would. That's potentially a valid case. Find some Dems and rep them too.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over. I actually recommend evaluating the double suit approach for all cases. A bad election official screws things up for everyone and if you consider the spitroast approach then you can have things intersect on them (like triangulating).

Politicians and officials are often only in it for themselves and everyone is an injured party. Have the wounded all gang bang them from every conceivable angle but mostly the inconceivable ones like a dick kracken having its way with a piece of swiss cheese until they are themselves officially screwed and that's the only thing that'll still be official about them.

125 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected, basically their vote wouldn't count but they made them think it would. That's potentially a valid case. Find some Dems and rep them too.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over. I actually recommend evaluating the double suit approach for all cases. A bad election official screws things up for everyone and if you consider the spitroast approach then you can have things intersect on them (like triangulating).

Politicians and officials are often only in it for themselves and everyone is an injured party. Have the wounded all gang bang them from every conceivable angle like a dick kracken having its way with a piece of swiss cheese until they are themselves officially screwed and that's the only thing that'll still be official about them.

125 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected, basically their vote wouldn't count but they made them think it would. That's potentially a valid case. Find some Dems and rep them too.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over. I actually recommend evaluating the double suit approach for all cases. A bad election official screws things up for everyone and if you consider the spitroast approach then you can have things intersect on them (like triangulating).

125 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over. I actually recommend evaluating the double suit approach for all cases. A bad election official screws things up for everyone and if you consider the spitroast approach then you can have things intersect on them (like triangulating).

125 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over. I actually recommend evaluating the double suit approach for all cases.

125 days ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests. If you do that it makes it clear how much their own representatives screwed them over.

125 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests.

125 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I would consider being nasty and opening up another case with this.

File that Democrats disenfranchised voters and engaged in voter intimidation saying every vote would count encouraging them and misleading them to do things like vote without completing the full application process knowing full well those votes would later be disputed and inevitably rejected.

Even though I support Trump I'm fully fair and impartial. I consider both sides and all their arguments. It also create hilarious openings like this. Sometimes the more impartial you are the more partial you can be. Especially when your side is in the right party. Impartiality is the best possible thing.

The thing is about the Democrats is that they're stupid and always set themselves up so you can actually start also filing suits in their interests.

125 days ago
1 score