Win / TheDonald
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Guys, this isn't an election suit. This is "old" suit, challenging changes in election law. Look at the date of filing (September).

That case was decided before the elections. I guess they finally published their full opinion today, that's it.

And to the "votes to be thrown out" theme - it's impossible - even if you single out every person who illegally voted as confined, you don't know whom they voted for. All the ballots are now mixed together.

This decision can now be used in election suit in WI, but that's it. Maybe, and this is a big maybe, WI SC will do what's right and will rule election as contested.

39 days ago
3 score
Reason: Original

Guys, this isn't an election suit. This is "old" suit, challenging changes in election law. Look at the date of filing (September).

That case was decided before the elections. I guess they finally published their full opinion today, that's it.

And to the "votes to be thrown out" theme - it's impossible - even if you single out every person who illegally voted as confined, you don't know whom their voted for. All the ballots are now mixed together.

This decision can now be used in election suit in WI, but that's it. Maybe, and this is a big maybe, WI SC will do what's right and will rule election as contested.

39 days ago
1 score