Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

The way I read the 2nd Amendment, it's like this:

Because a well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The constitution makes no reference to some supposition that, in order to own guns you have to be part of a well regulated militia. That's bullshit. Basically the founding fathers stated the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.

All gun control laws and restrictions are unconstitutional.

361 days ago
5 score
Reason: Original

The way I read the 2nd Amendment, it's like this:

Because a well regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The constitution makes to reference to some supposition that, in order to own guns you have to be part of a well regulated militia. That's bullshit. Basically the founding fathers stated the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Period.

All gun control laws and restrictions are unconstitutional.

361 days ago
5 score