Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

To be honest for me the Flynn affair sealed the deal. I support Trump but I always take the side of the truth and I just wasn't really following that.

I took a look when the sentencing thing came up. He pleaded guilty and I don't like lying but it was immediately evident to me that they were pushing for disproportionate enforcement as you could easily catch people lying under oath in the affair one the other side and also the whole investigation in the first place was unequivocally political as well as ruling innocent meaning that no lie really covered any reasonably enforceable law.

I thought it was pretty bad then but then the list of names who unmasked him was released, the note book proving without a shadow of a doubt he was entrapped which had been withheld from him and in spite of all that being all in the open Sullivan refusing to let it go.

If anyone in the US thinks they can rely on the courts after that they're joking.

There are other cases of courts turning corrupt on political cases I've spotted long before this but those are a bot more obscure despite their wide reaching implications.

This was very high profile and in plain sight. No one at all batted an eyelid at the corruption caught red handed. In fact the media pilled in on Sullivan to stretch it out eternally.

What this means is in any case they can do anything they want. If in a high profile case the jury says guilty because they know someone's innocent but for a laugh then that flies.

118 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

To be honest for me the Flynn affair sealed the deal. I support Trump but I always take the side of the truth and I just wasn't really following that.

I took a look when the sentencing thing came up. He pleaded guilty and I don't like lying but it was immediately evident to me that they were pushing for disproportionate enforcement as you could easily catch people lying under oath in the affair one the other side and also the whole investigation in the first place was unequivocally political as well as ruling innocent meaning that no lie really covered any reasonably enforceable law.

I thought it was pretty bad then but then the list of names who unmasked him was released, the note book proving without a shadow of a doubt he was entrapped which had been withheld from him and in spite of all that being all in the open Sullivan refusing to let it go.

If anyone in the US things they can rely on the courts after that they're joking.

There are other cases of courts turning corrupt on political cases I've spotted long before this but those are a bot more obscure despite their wide reaching implications.

This was very high profile and in plain sight. No one at all batted an eyelid at the corruption caught red handed. In fact the media pilled in on Sullivan to stretch it out eternally.

118 days ago
1 score