Thanks for sharing. Arizona video is intriguing. I found the segment from +1:30 to +2:45 elapsed especially clear. The transition at +2:15 elapsed is brilliant. The absentee pre-load charge has no context in the video, but seems fundamental to the presentation's theme. Is that an intentional omission?

I'd like to see the data attribution segment that follows (+2:56 elapsed) setup with a statement like the bullet on the summary slide highlighting that the data your team analyzed is the data on which SOS certified. That is essential and deserves stating at the start of the segment. The breakdown from Javascript to json to spreadsheet is great.

Was the term "Voter Fraud" preferred to "Election Fraud"?

Looking forward to watching your team's other videos later tonight.

Thanks for sharing. Arizona video is intriguing. I found the +1:30 to +2:45 elapsed especially clear. The transition at +2:15 elapsed is brilliant. The absentee pre-load charge has no context in the video, but seems fundamental to the presentation's theme.

I'd like to see the data attribution segment that follows (+2:56 elapsed) setup with a statement like the bullet on the summary slide highlighting that the data your team analyzed is the data on which SOS certified. That is essential and deserves stating at the start of the segment. The breakdown from Javascript to json to spreadsheet is great.

Was the term "Voter Fraud" preferred to "Election Fraud"?

Looking forward to watching your team's other videos later tonight.