I think the original responses that came back from Wisconsin is what's going to keep SCOTUS from hearing this one, because it's actually one of the few "wins" Trump has had in court (though in practice it's totally unfeasible).
They basically ruled that Trump's team was welcome to challenge any and all registrations that they felt didn't meet the requirements. However, they said that those challenges had to be supported with evidence and that they weren't willing to just toss all the registrations from that 3-ish day timeframe where people were told they could claim COVID as a reason for indefinite confinement, because there were surely people who did meet the requirements who registered during that time, and they weren't willing to disenfranchise the people who really did follow the interpretation of the law that was ultimately ruled the 'correct' one.
And obviously Trump's team can't take the time to gather evidence and individually charge 20k odd voters.
But I still think it'll be used as validation to defer to the lower court.
I think the original response that came back from Wisconsin is what's going to keep SCOTUS from hearing this one, because it's actually one of the few "wins" Trump has had in court (though in practice it's totally unfeasible).
They basically ruled that Trump's team was welcome to challenge any and all registrations that they felt didn't meet the requirements. However, they said that those challenges had to be supported with evidence and that they weren't willing to just toss all the registrations from that 3-ish day timeframe where people were told they could claim COVID as a reason for indefinite confinement, because there were surely people who did meet the requirements who registered during that time, and they weren't willing to disenfranchise the people who really did follow the interpretation of the law that was ultimately ruled the 'correct' one.
And obviously Trump's team can't take the time to gather evidence and individually charge 20k odd voters.
But I still think it'll be used as validation to defer to the lower court.