Being pedantic he would be someone funding terrorism and there are regulations against that. He will see himself as someone funding "activism" though there's a very fine line between activist and terrorist or militant.

BLM's activities have for a long time conclusively and frequently crossed that line. It's not only Soros implicated but a huge web now tied into black supremacists militant organisations like BLM.

It's also media backed with the media peddling provable lies to deliberately inflate racial tensions and invoke a violent backlash over false positives the press could easily identify as such of racial victimisation. This also implicates big tech who have hate speech policies against people who refute this specific category of hate speech.

For example, there's a policy on many platforms where hate speech is deemed as "down playing the victimisation of black people" so if a black supremacist falsely conveys an instance in which a black person died as a racist assault due to their skin colour when that was not the reason and you correct that misconception then you are banned even though you're the one actually opposing hate speech such as racial defamation.

If the FBI and other agencies charged with suppressing domestic threats had cracked down on BLM earlier this might not have been a problem but it's now ironic for if you recognise BLM for what it actually is and then respond appropriately it brings down half the system with it. The collective wealth of those who have been backing, funding or aiding and abetting this terrorist organisation and movement goes well into the trillions.

I think it would be quite interesting if people sue as victims of BLM terrorism and then have a go at going up the chain. This usually isn't easy to do but the material support for BLM is overwhelming and in terms of the propaganda it's very much an open and shut case against the press / big tech that their actions were gtossly wrongful and clearly not simple error.

Being pedantic he would be someone funding terrorism and there are regulations against that. He will see himself as someone funding "activism" though there's a very fine line between activist and terrorist or militant.

BLM's activities have for a long time conclusively and frequently crossed that line. It's not only Soros implicated but a huge web now tied into black supremacists militant organisations like BLM.

It's also media backed with the media peddling provable lies to deliberately inflate racial tensions and invoke a violent backlash over false positives the press could easily identify as such of racial victimisation. This also implicates big tech who have hate speech policies against people who refute this specific category of hate speech.

For example, there's a policy on many platforms where hate speech is deemed as "down playing the victimisation of black people" so if a black supremacist falsely conveys an instance in which a black person died as a racist assault due to their skin colour when that was not the reason and you correct that misconception then you are banned even though you're the one actually opposing hate speech such as racial defamation.

If the FBI and other agencies charged with suppressing domestic threats had cracked down on BLM earlier this might not have been a problem but it's now ironic for if you recognise BLM for what it actually is and then respond appropriately it brings down half the system with it. The collective wealth of those who have been backing, funding or aiding and abetting this terrorist organisation and movement goes well into the trillions.

Being pedantic he would be someone funding terrorism and there are regulations against that. He will see himself as someone funding "activism" though there's a very fine line between activist and terrorist or militant.

BLM's activities have for a long time conclusively and frequently crossed that line. It's not only Soros implicated but a huge web now tied into black supremacists militant organisations like BLM.

It's also media backed with the media peddling provable lies to deliberately inflate racial tensions and invoke a violent backlash over false positives the press could easily identify as such of racial victimisation. This also implicates big tech who have hate speech policies against people who refute this specific category of hate speech.

For example, there's a policy on many platforms where hate speech is deemed as "down playing the victimisation of black people" so if a black supremacist falsely conveys an instance in which a black person died as a racist assault due to their skin colour when that was not the reason and you correct that misconception then you are banned even though you're the one actually opposing hate speech such as racial defamation.

If the FBI and other agencies charged with suppressing domestic threats had cracked down on BLM earlier this might not have been a problem but it's now ironic for if you recognise BLM for what it actually is and then respond appropriately it brings down half the system with it.

Being pedantic he would be someone funding terrorism and there are regulations against that. He will see himself as someone funding "activism" though there's a very fine line between activist and terrorist or militant.

BLM's activities have for a long time conclusively and frequently crossed that line. It's not only Soros implicated but a huge web now tied into black supremacists militant organisations like BLM.

It's also media backed with the media peddling provable lies to deliberately inflate racial tensions and invoke a violent backlash over false positives the press could easily identify as such of racial victimisation. This also implicates big tech who have hate speech policies against people who refute this specific category of hate speech.

For example, there's a policy on many platforms where hate speech is deemed as "down playing the victimisation of black people" so if a black supremacist falsely conveys an instance in which a black person died as a racist assault due to their skin colour when that was not the reason and you correct that misconception then you are banned.