Do your analysis on the SCYTL data when we put that out, and let's see how it compares.

That would be great!

Just to be clear -- we're not using any decimal places, or any data that uses decimal places.

Yes I am aware.

If you're using that from the Edison data, you need to switch to the part of the json that has discrete numbers, and perform your analysis there.

I did use the data with decimal places which was very limited in its usefulness. For the batch I analyzed, however, I corrected for the rounding imprecision by adding decimal places to reduce Biden's variance as much as mathematically possible and he STILL got a minimum of 98%. And that batch is almost double his margin of victory. If we could get more details on this batch it could be very interesting.

Do your analysis on the SCYTL data when we put that out, and let's see how it compares.

That would be great!

Just to be clear -- we're not using any decimal places, or any data that uses decimal places.

Yes I am aware.

If you're using that from the Edison data, you need to switch to the part of the json that has discrete numbers, and perform your analysis there.

I did use the data with decimal places which was very limited in its usefulness. For the batch I analyzed, however, I corrected for the rounding imprecision by adding decimal places to reduce Biden's variance as much as mathematically possible and he STILL got a minimum of 98%. And that batch is almost double his margin of victory. If we could get more details on this batch it could be very interesting.