Wanna know if something a larp? A pretty reliable litmus test is to ask yourself:

Have you been shown any evidence at all to support the claim?

And by "evidence" we don't mean mere claims. Anyone can take to twitter or 4chan and just say "John Roberts is a pedophile" or "Epstein is still alive". Those are not evidence. Those are just claims. Anyone can make any claim at all. And they're all worthless without evidence.

If you're believing mere claims without a shred of evidence to substantiate them (like Lynn Wood just saying Roberts is a child trafficker on Twitter, or some anon on 4chan just saying Epstein's alive), then you're doing rationality and common sense wrong. Because those people have given you no reason to believe a word they're saying.

It's not healthy to be so gullible as to believe any random idiot at their word without a shred of proof. That's called being a sucker. That's not a good thing.

Wanna know if something a larp? A pretty reliable litmus test is to ask yourself:

Have you been shown any evidence at all to support the claim?

And by "evidence" we don't mean mere claims. Anyone can take to twitter or 4chan and just say "John Roberts is a pedophile" or "Epstein is still alive". Those are not evidence. Those are just claims. Anyone can make any claim at all. And they're all worthless without evidence.

If you're believing mere claims without a shred of evidence to substantiate them (like Lynn Wood just saying Roberts is a child trafficked on Twitter, or some anon on 4chan just saying Epstein's alive), then you're doing rationality and common sense wrong. Because those people have given you no reason to believe a word they're saying.

It's not healthy to be so gullible as to believe any random idiot at their word without a shred of proof. That's called being a sucker. That's not a good thing.