Thanks for your great response.

Questions however.

■Signature match in Arizona wasnt public before the election. The machine ran counter to the rules ■Michigan has so many mismatches it cant be certified. Any reasonable man would say that. ■I could do a paragraph on Pennsylvania and yes, they did sue before hand. ■Kemp and his secret agreement with Abrams was constitutional?

None of these could genuinely have latches issues if everything I understand is true. There are more however the above appear to meet the criteria for contested election.

Edit** I realize there is much a question here but you get me?

Thanks for your great response.

Questions however.

■Signature match in Arizona wasnt public before the election. The machine ran counter to the rules ■Michigan has so many mismatches it cant be certified. Any reasonable man would say that. ■I could do a paragraph on Pennsylvania and yes, they did sue before hand. ■Kemp and his secret agreement with Abrams was constitutional?

None of these could genuinely have latches issues if everything I understand is true. There are more however the above appear to meet the criteria for contested election.