Damn you started a shit show of a thread lol.

All U.S. police (and military) take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. The police who betray the oath that they ALL took to enforce unconstitutional orders (in the preservation of their income and retirement payments) are in violation of their sworn oaths, thus "Oathbreaker".

You're referring to the "Oathkeepers", a group of predominantly prior military/police who have sworn an eternal loyalty to the oath that they took.

To me, calling a policeman an "Oathbreaker" is much more insulting than "pig" because you're pretty much calling them force prostitutes - they'll do anything for money, even break the only promise they had to make to get the job. Worse than mercenaries who never take such an oath.

Damn you started a shit show of a thread lol.

All U.S. police (and military) take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. The police who betray the oath that they ALL took to enforce unconstitutional orders (in the preservation of their income and retirement payments) are in violation of their sworn oaths, thus "Oathbreaker".

You're referring to the "Oathkeepers", a group of predominantly prior military/police who have sworn an eternal loyalty to the oath that they took.

To me, calling a policeman an "Oathbreaker" is much more insulting than "pig" because you're pretty much calling them force prostitutes - they'll do anything for money, even break the only promise they had to make to get the job.