No. You are misunderstanding. Rewatch the testimony.

There are two buttons on the screen when an error pops up. One is "DISCARD" the other is "RESCAN". When you hit rescan, the tabulator fires up and keeps going. It keeps the old tally and keeps going. When you hit discard, it clears the tally.

If you're not a computer person, watch her hands when she first says discard and rescan, she's boxing out the two options that pop up when you get the error and must tell the tabulator what to do.

So if you put all the ballots back in and hit the discard button, you're starting from scratch. If you hit the rescan button, you're keeping the tally of all the previously scanned, and are creating double, triple, quadruple tallies.

The issue is that the correct procedure, hitting 'discard' and scanning again looks the same as hitting 'rescan' and scanning again.

This isn't evidence of fraud (hitting rescan) this is evidence of the jam. It's evidence of the opportunity for fraud. But that's not a big deal because no one is contesting jams. THEY say there were jams. It's already widely accepted and uncontested that there were jams. So this isn't evidence of anything that makes any headway in demonstrating fraud.

I don't like being called a douche when I'm trying desperately to help you and others ground yourself in a properly informed foundation... just because you don't want to believe what I'm telling you.

No. You are misunderstanding. Rewatch the testimony.

There are two buttons on the screen when an error pops up. One is "DISCARD" the other is "RESCAN". When you hit rescan, the tabulator fires up and keeps going. It keeps the old tally and keeps going. When you hit discard, it clears the tally.

If you're not a computer person, watch her hands when she first says discard and rescan, she's boxing out the two options that pop up when you get the error and must tell the tabulator what to do.

So if you put all the ballots back in and hit the discard button, you're starting from scratch. If you hit the rescan button, you're keeping the tally of all the previously scanned, and are creating double, triple, quadruple tallies.

The issue is that the correct procedure, hitting 'discard' and scanning again looks the same as hitting 'rescan' and scanning again.

This isn't evidence of fraud (hitting rescan) this is evidence of the jam. It's evidence of the opportunity for fraud. But that's not a big deal because no one is contesting jams. THEY say there were jams. It's already widely accepted and uncontested that there were jams. So this isn't evidence of anything that makes any headway in demonstrating fraud.