Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

What the hell are you talking about? If I have posted anything with this "outlined" in it, that hasn't been the reason the article was posted. So if I I didn't read it it's because you assumed the whole article was relevant to my post.

Edit: Ok I see you stalked me two pages back to find a post where you completely missed the point. No I didn't read the whole article and I didn't need to because the only part that interested me was Wood's allegedly claiming to be the Second Coming.

You like many others, assumed I was talking about the punching allegation or whatever allegations are made in the lawsuit. The point of the discussion you've decided to resurrect after days in a separate post was that people were making claims about Lin, thus indicating that he should sue to prove them wrong according to common logic. If you thought it was about their lawsuit that's your problem.

79 days ago
1 score
Reason: Original

What the hell are you talking about? If I have posted anything with this "outlined" in it, that hasn't been the reason the article was posted. So if I I didn't read it it's because you assumed the whole article was relevant to my post.

79 days ago
1 score