You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what is said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one. You might also interpret that as he is his vehicle. That's really not specific, more analogous, to what we don't really know or I don't but usually you use an analogy to explain something on someone's own terms where it is not necessary to be exact to be understood.

In this case basically saying that he was converted or it's alright. If I'm getting things right he does do things to convince Saul of this rather than truly possessing him or manipulating him without his knowledge. If you look at what he actually refers to you see that he makes an effort to appeal to his will like speaking to him and blinding him for days.

You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what is said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one. You might also interpret that as he is his vehicle. That's really not specific, more analogous, to what we don't really know or I don't but usually you use an analogy to explain something on someone's own terms where it is not necessary to be exact to be understood.

In this case basically saying that he was converted or it's alright. If I'm getting things right he does do things to convince (appeal to his will) Saul of this rather than truly possessing him or manipulating him without his knowledge.

You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what is said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one. You might also interpret that as he is his vehicle. That's really not specific, more analogous, to what we don't really know or I don't but usually you use an analogy to explain something on someone's own terms where it is not necessary to be exact to be understood.

In this case basically saying that he was converted or it's alright. If I'm getting things right he does do things to convince (appeal to his will) Saul of this rather than truly possessing him.

You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what is said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one. You might also interpret that as he is his vehicle. That's really not specific, more analogous, to what we don't really know or I don't but usually you use an analogy to explain something on someone's own terms where it is not necessary to be exact to be understood.

In this case basically saying that he was converted or it's alright. If I'm getting things right he does do things to convince Saul of this appealing to his will rather than truly possessing him.

You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what is said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one. You might also interpret that as he is his vehicle. That's really not specific, more analogous, to what we don't really know or I don't but usually you use an analogy to explain something on someone's own terms where it is not necessary to be exact to be understood.

In this case basically saying that he was converted or it's alright. If I'm getting things right he does do things to convince Saul of this rather than truly possessing him.

You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what is said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one. You might also interpret that as he is his vehicle. That's really not specific, more analogous, to what we don't really know or I don't but usually you use an analogy to explain something on someone's own terms where it is not necessary to be exact to be understood.

In this case basically saying that he was converted or it's alright.

You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what isn't said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one. You might also interpret that as he is his vehicle. That's really not specific, more analogous, to what we don't really know or I don't but usually you use an analogy to explain something on someone's own terms where it is not necessary to be exact to be understood.

In this case basically saying that he was converted or it's alright.

You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what isn't said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one. You might also interpret that as he is his vehicle. That's really not specific, more analogous, to what we don't really know or I don't but usually you use an analogy to explain something on someone's own terms where it is not necessary to be exact to be understood.

You cannot truly know what exactly is meant by that if it doesn't elaborate and it's not really important to know exactly what it means or read into it too much when it says he's his instrument or vessel of sorts.

Sometimes what isn't said tells you more than what isn't said. He does not say "Saul is actually me [in disguise]" which would be the case if he were a puppet.

You could say he is using someone though usually when we say using someone it is meant in a negative sense rather than the broader sense.

That passage is not always translated the same and I don't think it means to use an instrument like literally how you might use a hammer yet the result might be the same with in effect the will of each being as one.