Yes, I know she's the same lady.
An as a result, if I had to place a bet on whether she is hitting 'rescan' rather than 'discard' as she clears that jam, then I can assure you in light of all the OTHER evidence, I am unlikely to go all in on this being above board, that's for sure.
But THIS VIDEO, is not evidence of fraud.
It's evidence of a jam. That's all.
That doesn't mean I believe them. That doesn't mean fraud didn't occur. That just means that THAT VIDEO isn't evidence of fraud.
no system should be "jamming" constantly ... The ballots should have all been hand counted ... should have been audited IMMEDIATELY after the election
No shit. We also need national ID verification, inked fingers, and illegal aliens should be deported rather than given state issued ID. But all that is an aside.
The fact they refused to let them be audited means that these women were committing election fraud UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE
Yes, that's evidence of wrongdoing. (But not evidence of a specific person committing specific fraud in a specific slice of time.) And the reason why their rejection of review is evidence of fraud in general, is because there is no reasonable alternative.
The 100' distant observers is evidence of fraud, because we can reject all alternative explanations (if they were worried about covid, they wouldn't let workers sit side by side)
But in THIS VIDEO, you can not reject the reasonable alternative explanation, the simple clearing of a jam. Because nothing in the video differs in any way from that normal legitimate procedure.
Yes, I know she's the same lady.
An as a result, if I had to place a bet on whether she is hitting 'rescan' rather than 'discard' as she clears that jam, then I can assure you in light of all the OTHER evidence, I am unlikely to go all in on this being above board, that's for sure.
But THIS VIDEO, is not evidence of fraud.
It's evidence of a jam. That's all.
That doesn't mean I believe them. That doesn't mean fraud didn't occur. That just means that THAT VIDEO isn't evidence of fraud.
no system should be "jamming" constantly ... The ballots should have all been hand counted ... should have been audited IMMEDIATELY after the election
No shit. We also need national ID verification, inked fingers, and illegal aliens should be deported rather than given state issued ID. But all that is an aside.
The fact they refused to let them be audited means that these women were committing election fraud UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE
Yes, that's evidence of wrongdoing. (But not evidence of a specific person committing specific fraud in a specific slice of time.) And the reason why their rejection of review is evidence of fraud in general, is because there is no reasonable alternative.
The 100' distant observers is evidence of fraud, because we can reject all alternative explanations (if they were worried about covid, they would let workers sit side by side)
But in THIS VIDEO, you can not reject the reasonable alternative explanation, the simple clearing of a jam. Because nothing in the video differs in any way from that normal legitimate procedure.
Yes, I know she's the same lady.
An as a result, if I had to place a bet on whether she is hitting 'rescan' rather than 'discard' as she clears that jam, then I can assure you in light of all the OTHER evidence, I am unlikely to go all in on this being above board, that's for sure.
But THIS VIDEO, is not evidence of fraud.
It's evidence of a jam. That's all.
That doesn't mean I believe them. That doesn't mean fraud didn't occur. That just means that THAT VIDEO isn't evidence of fraud.
no system should be "jamming" constantly ... The ballots should have all been hand counted ... should have been audited IMMEDIATELY after the election
No shit. We also need national ID verification, inked fingers, and illegal aliens should be deported rather than given state issued ID. But all that is an aside.
The fact they refused to let them be audited means that these women were committing election fraud UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE
Yes, that's evidence of wrongdoing. Because there is no reasonable alternative.
The 100' distant observers is evidence of fraud, because we can reject all alternative explanations (if they were worried about covid, they would let workers sit side by side)
But in THIS VIDEO, you can not reject the reasonable alternative explanation, the simple clearing of a jam. Because nothing in the video differs in any way from that normal legitimate procedure.