If you’re calling him/her/xim/xer an ‘apologist’, you’ll have to explain what you mean, I’m too dumb to unnnerstand wut you sayed howed you was talkin it.

It’s easy for anyone to project meaning/interpretation that they want to believe onto evidence. The difference between our side and the filthy lefties is that we are not afraid to scrutinize and deal with reality.

He scrutinized the article and demonstrated that it does not actually offer supporting evidence for the ‘promise’ of the headline.

That doesn’t mean the ‘headline story’ is necessarily wrong, it just shows that THIS isn’t proof. So we’ll need to keep looking to find ACTUAL proof. No more or less.

The chart indicates SOMETHING is different; if it’s HCQ, there will be proof of that somewhere.

Ultimately our arguments are stronger if they’re supported by more than hope and rhetorical interpretation.

MAGA

If you’re calling him/her/xim/xer an ‘apologist’, you’ll have to explain what you mean, I’m too dumb to unnnerstand wut you sayed howed you was talkin it.

It’s easy for anyone to project meaning/interpretation that they want to believe onto evidence. The difference between our side and the filthy lefties is that we are not afraid to scrutinize and deal with reality.

He scrutinized the article and demonstrated that it does not actually offer supporting evidence for the ‘promise’ of the headline.

That doesn’t mean the ‘headline story’ is necessarily wrong, it just shows that THIS isn’t proof. So we’ll need to keep looking to find ACTUAL proof. No more or less.

Ultimately our arguments are stronger if they’re supported by more than hope and rhetorical interpretation.

MAGA

If you’re calling him/her/xim/xer an ‘apologist’, you’ll have to explain what you mean, I’m too dumb to unnnerstand wut you sayed howed you was talkin it.