Yeah, and a lot of them made bad choices and died for absolutely nothing, as another poster on this comment chain just pointed out. A lot of Dudleys were completely ineffective and therefore could've lived on for decades afterward, with ZERO effect on the outcome of the relevant conflict either way.

Dying for a cause is sometimes warranted, but if not done correctly it's an unnecessary, ineffective, total waste.

Lots of Dudleys in the past died for my freedom, but lots more Dudleys died for nothing at all. Tragic but true.

So no, as I said, I'm not endorsing cowards. It's not a simple, black-and-white thing.

Yeah, and a lot of them made bad choices and died for absolutely nothing, as another poster on this comment chain just pointed out. A lot of Dudleys were dumbasses who were completely ineffective and therefore could've lived on for decades afterward, with ZERO effect on the outcome of the relevant conflict either way.

Dying for a cause is sometimes warranted, but if not done correctly it's an unnecessary, ineffective, total waste.

Lots of Dudleys in the past died for my freedom, but lots more Dudleys died for nothing at all. Tragic but true.

So no, as I said, I'm not endorsing cowards. It's not a simple, black-and-white thing.

Yeah, and a lot of them made bad choices and died for absolutely nothing, as another poster on this comment chain just pointed out. A lot of Dudleys were dumbasses who were completely ineffective and therefore could've lived on for decades afterward, with ZERO effect on the outcome of the relevant conflict either way.

Dying for a cause is sometimes warranted, but if not done correctly it's an unnecessary waste.

Lots of Dudleys in the past died for my freedom, but lots more Dudleys died for nothing at all. Tragic but true.

So no, as I said, I'm not endorsing cowards. It's not a simple, black-and-white thing.