To anybody having the displeasure to sit in an argument with genuine borderline retarded morons (not kidding, I genuinely believe many to be somewhere on the bottom half of the charts) who use words without understanding their meaning, tell them this. Social fascism is, by definition, the exaltation of state ideology held above all else, including individual rights. The constitution, by definition, are the sets of rules that prohibit the state on infringing individual rights. It is, quite literally, the polar opposite of fascism. Let them look it up. They likely won’t, do. They’d rather enrich themselves on hate than knowledge,

Economic fascism is intended, historically, to be the mediator between farI eft economies (meaning heavily authoritative economics) but with some semblance of a “free” market. Hitler himself lambasted capitalism and labelled it as exploitative of worker rights and intended to bridge a gap by allowing solely companies who adhere to state ideology access to the market. Sound familiar? It should. That’s quite literally what’s happening now with Iock downs..... Only businesses deemed essential and considered productive to the state are allowed to open up.

Arguing with these people, citing historic examples, factual information, providing quantitative as well as qualitative analysis, feels about as futile as trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Only difference is, they’re the same shape. Just that the the hole is too small and refuses to take any of it in. The thing is, I feel they could widen it if they let go of much of their academic indoctrination, so I don’t feel it’s hopeless. Many genuinely are capable in other aspects.

To anybody having the displeasure to sit in an argument with genuine borderline retarded morons (not kidding, I genuinely believe many to be somewhere on the bottom half of the charts) who use words without understanding their meaning, tell them this. Social f*scism is, by definition, the exaltation of state ideology held above all else, including individual rights. The constitution, by definition, are the sets of rules that prohibit the state on infringing individual rights. It is, quite literally, the polar opposite of f*scism. Let them look it up. They likely won’t, do. They’d rather enrich themselves on hate than knowledge,

Economic f*scism is intended, historically, to be the mediator between farI eft economies (meaning heavily authoritative economics) but with some semblance of a “free” market. Hortler himself lambasted capitalism and labelled it as exploitative of worker rights and intended to bridge a gap by allowing solely companies who adhere to state ideology access to the market. Sound familiar? It should. That’s quite literally what’s happening now with Iock downs..... Only businesses deemed essential and considered productive to the state are allowed to open up.

Arguing with these people, citing historic examples, factual information, providing quantitative as well as qualitative analysis, feels about as futile as trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Only difference is, they’re the same shape. Just that the the hole is too small and refuses to take any of it in. The thing is, I feel they could widen it if they let go of much of their academic indoctrination, so I don’t feel it’s hopeless. Many genuinely are capable in other aspects.

To anybody having the displeasure to sit in an argument with genuine borderline retarded morons (not kidding, I genuinely believe many to be somewhere on the bottom half of the charts) who use words without understanding their meaning, tell them this. Social f*scism is, by definition, the exaltation of state ideology held above all else, including individual rights. The constitution, by definition, are the sets of rules that prohibit the state on infringing individual rights. It is, quite literally, the polar opposite of f*scism. Let them look it up. They likely won’t, do. They’d rather enrich themselves on hate than knowledge,

Economic f*scism is intended, historically, to be the mediator between farI eft economies (meaning heavily authoritative economics) but with some semblance of a “free” market. Hortler himself lambasted capitalism and labelled it as exploitative of worker rights and intended to bridge a gap by allowing solely companies who adhere to state ideology access to the market. Sound familiar? It should. That’s quite literally what’s happening now with Iock downs..... Only businesses deemed essential and considered productive to the state are allowed to open up.

Arguing with these people, citing historic examples, factual information, providing quantitative as well as qualitative analysis, feels about as futile as trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Only difference is, they’re the same shape. Just that the the hole is too small and refuses to take any of it in. The thing is, I feel they could widen it if they let go of much of their academic indoctrination, so I don’t feel it’s hopeless. Many genuinely are capable in other aspects.

To anybody having the displeasure to sit in an argument with genuine borderline retarded morons (not kidding, I genuinely believe many to be somewhere on the bottom half of the charts) who use words without understanding their meaning, tell them this. Social fscism is, by definition, the exaltation of state ideology held above all else, including individual rights. The constitution, by definition, are the sets of rules that prohibit the state on infringing individual rights. It is, quite literally, the polar opposite of fscism. Let them look it up. They likely won’t, do. They’d rather enrich themselves on hate than knowledge,

Economic f*scism is intended, historically, to be the mediator between farI eft economies (meaning heavily authoritative economics) but with some semblance of a “free” market. Hortler himself lambasted capitalism and labelled it as exploitative of worker rights and intended to bridge a gap by allowing solely companies who adhere to state ideology access to the market. Sound familiar? It should. That’s quite literally what’s happening now with Iock downs..... Only businesses deemed essential and considered productive to the state are allowed to open up.

Arguing with these people, citing historic examples, factual information, providing quantitative as well as qualitative analysis, feels about as futile as trying to put a square peg in a round hole. Only difference is, they’re the same shape. Just that the the hole is too small and refuses to take any of it in. The thing is, I feel they could widen it if they let go of much of their academic indoctrination, so I don’t feel it’s hopeless. Many genuinely are capable in other aspects.