Courts mostly always side with the government and never the people. It's just in their nature. For the most part, courts exist to give legitimacy to the government but are mostly in effect , nothing but a ceremonial process. China actually understands this about courts.

Western governments like to hide behind their court system to justify government corruption/inaction but the minute the courts become a problem for the government, they circumvent them. Any time the courts seem to appear to rule in favour of the people, it's because politics were involved not because the courts truly have power.

Almost all activist court rulings exist because that is what the society has been changing toward and what the government wants to allow happen.

If people want Trump to be President, it's clear that the courts aren't going to be what determines that. The founding fathers understood that. True power is derived from force, period.

Courts mostly always side with the government and never the people. It's just in there nature. For the most part, courts exist to give legitimacy to the government but are mostly in effect , nothing but a ceremonial process. China actually understands this about courts.

Western governments like to hide behind their court system to justify government corruption/inaction but the minute the courts become a problem for the government, they circumvent them. Any time the courts seem to appear to rule in favour of the people, it's because politics were involved not because the courts truly have power.

Almost all activist court rulings exist because that is what the society has been changing toward and what the government wants to allow happen.

If people want Trump to be President, it's clear that the courts aren't going to be what determines that. The founding fathers understood that. True power is derived from force, period.