He might be the person to resolve a disagreement between the House and the Senate if they're split. Power to unilaterally elect himself and POTUS is a massive stretch.

I still say they really have nothing to lose by trying anyway. If SCOTUS has no jurisdiction to adjudicate this, who's going to say what is or isn't legal?

He might be the person to resolve a disagreement between the House and the Senate if they're split. Power to unilaterally elect himself and POTUS is a massive stretch.

I still say they really have nothing to lose trying it anyway by trying. If SCOTUS has no jurisdiction to adjudicate this, who's going to say what is or isn't legal?