Win / TheDonald
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out, anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words, both biologically and socially.

THIS DISEASE DOES NOT AFFECT CHILDREN, SO WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

There are very few cases of children getting it.

As the virus recedes, people nobody ever thought about, who were thrown into the spotlight by this virus, will be forgotten again. But they may be reluctant to leave the spotlight. They may be full of ideas, to stay interesting and in charge of things.

354 days ago
7 score
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out, anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words, both biologically and socially.

THIS DISEASE IS KNOWN TO NOT AFFECT CHILDREN ANYWAY, SO WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

There are very few cases of children getting it.

As the virus recedes, people nobody ever thought about, who were thrown into the spotlight by this virus, will be forgotten again. But they may be reluctant to leave the spotlight. They may be full of ideas, to stay interesting and in charge of things.

354 days ago
7 score
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out, anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words, both biologically and socially.

THIS DISEASE IS KNOWN TO NOT AFFECT CHILDREN ANYWAY, SO WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

There are very few cases of children getting it.

As the virus recedes, people who nobody ever thought about, who were thrown into the spotlight by this virus, will be forgotten again. But they may be reluctant to leave the spotlight. They may be full of ideas, just to stay interesting.

354 days ago
6 score
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out, anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words, both biologically and socially.

THIS DISEASE IS KNOWN TO NOT AFFECT CHILDREN ANYWAY, SO WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

There are very few cases of children getting it.

As the virus plays out and recedes, lots of people who nobody ever thought about, who were thrown into the spotlight by this virus, will have to be forgotten again. But they may be reluctant to leave the spotlight. They may be full of ideas to stay interesting.

354 days ago
5 score
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out, anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words, both biologically and socially.

THIS DISEASE IS KNOWN TO NOT AFFECT CHILDREN ANYWAY, SO WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

There are very few cases of children getting it.

As the virus plays out, lots of people who nobody ever thought about, who were in the spotlight, may be reluctant to leave the spotlight. Nobody talked about WHO before this virus. Now they and their people are suddenly interesting.

354 days ago
4 score
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words, both biologically and socially.

THIS DISEASE IS KNOWN TO NOT AFFECT CHILDREN ANYWAY, SO WHAT IS HE TALKING ABOUT?

There are very few cases of children getting it.

354 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words.

354 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing that might make sense in a plague that killed a third of the population. This virus is not doing that.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words.

354 days ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing that might make sense in a plague that killed a third of the population. Like in the Middle Ages. And did not transmit fast. But there isn't such a thing. The plagues of the past transmitted quickly.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words.

354 days ago
2 score
Reason: Original

Deeply stupid apart from horrifying. Any transmitting has already happened when the people live together. Separating them is no use. The horse has left the barn. This virus is very transmissable; that is the point of all the distancing even outdoors. So it's obvious that everybody in a home has been exposed. Exactly how they react depends on age and many personal factors of immunity and general health.

The Queen meant, if you can't visit your family who don't live with you that will be painful. She was making an analogy. I hope.

It is this other guy, from WHO, who is talking about the nightmare that can come from universal testing. What do you do with that information? Tell people where they can and can't go, and live?

Sending children into the countryside because their home in the city is under bombardment isn't stupid. This is stupid.

And now the virus is playing out anyway.

And now there are effective treatments for it.

And many of the tests are wrong anyway!

This is the "robust" testing and contact tracing that might make sense in a plague that killed a third of the population, and did not transmit fast. There isn't such a thing. The plagues of the past transmitted quickly. They were bacterial, not viral.

This is a very troubling video.

We are not a herd of prize cattle, to be biologically managed.

It is too stupid for words.

354 days ago
2 score