So why is Florida not insanely worse then NY or CA, they haven't done all that much locking down relative to those 2, and its full of old people. And its not "as much" for the flu, they are basically saying no one is dying of flu now. Also why are they using shit tests if their barometer for this ever ending is supposedly when cases go down (not deaths), the guy who made it even said it is not suitable and many people are saying, as I understand it, that they are basically tuning the test too sensitive to the point where it causes many false positives. BTW I am quite willing to admit there is some virus going around, just like there was when swine flu was going around, and sars. My point of contention comes when it seems very obvious they are overinflating the danger for some reason, which the stuff I have said supports. Look at how it was treated during the BLM riots as compared to rallies. At rallies it was going to kill everyone, at riots its NBD. It was also perfectly timed to attack Trump, and he is basically the only world leader being harassed endlessly over it. You seem to not be the run of the mill shill here so I give the benefit of the doubt, but i honestly don't understand how some people cannot see that this is at least a possibility?

So why is Florida not insanely worse then NY or CA, they haven't done all that much locking down relative to those 2, and its full of old people. And its not "as much" for the flu, they are basically saying no one is dying of flu now. Also why are they using shit tests if their barometer for this ever ending is supposedly when cases go down (not deaths), the guy who made it even said it is not suitable and many people are saying, as I understand it, that they are basically tuning the test too sensitive to the point where it causes many false positives.