"President Trump has been violating the Constitution by blocking people from following his Twitter account because they criticized or mocked him, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday. The ruling could have broader implications for how the First Amendment applies to the social-media era."

How is Twitter not in the same violation? If they are selectively, and purposely banning certain people/speech, they are no longer just a platform.

The Trump account was not able to even use certain features, like banning, on the platform because of 1A violations...

"President Trump has been violating the Constitution by blocking people from following his Twitter account because they criticized or mocked him, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday. The ruling could have broader implications for how the First Amendment applies to the social-media era."

How is Twitter not in the same violation? If they are selectively, and purposely banning certain people/speech, they are no longer just a platform.

"President Trump has been violating the Constitution by blocking people from following his Twitter account because they criticized or mocked him, a federal appeals court ruled on Tuesday. The ruling could have broader implications for how the First Amendment applies to the social-media era."

How is Twitter not in the same violation?